"But the reporter has the responsibility to determine, number one, whether that is true, and number two, to make a judgment as to whether it's in the public interest and whether or not it should be part of the debate"
About this Quote
Schieffer’s line is a quiet rebuke to the modern assumption that journalism’s main job is to relay whatever someone powerful just said. He’s insisting on an older, less glamorous ethic: reporters aren’t microphones; they’re filters with accountability. The two-step structure matters. “Number one” is verification, the unflashy labor that turns rumor into fact or, just as importantly, turns it back into rumor. “Number two” is judgment, and Schieffer doesn’t apologize for the word. He treats editorial discretion not as bias but as professional duty.
The subtext is aimed at the slippery logic of “both sides” coverage and the click-driven incentive to platform controversy first and sort it out later. When he says “whether it should be part of the debate,” he’s pushing back against the idea that every claim automatically earns a seat at the table. That’s a provocative stance in a media environment where neutrality is often confused with passivity and where “debate” can be manufactured by repetition.
Contextually, Schieffer comes out of broadcast news’ high-trust era, when gatekeeping was assumed and the public square had fewer entrances. In today’s fragmented ecosystem, his point reads less like nostalgia and more like a warning: if journalists outsource judgment to the loudest actors, they don’t become fairer; they become useful. The quote’s power is its refusal to romanticize transparency. Not everything that can be aired deserves to be.
The subtext is aimed at the slippery logic of “both sides” coverage and the click-driven incentive to platform controversy first and sort it out later. When he says “whether it should be part of the debate,” he’s pushing back against the idea that every claim automatically earns a seat at the table. That’s a provocative stance in a media environment where neutrality is often confused with passivity and where “debate” can be manufactured by repetition.
Contextually, Schieffer comes out of broadcast news’ high-trust era, when gatekeeping was assumed and the public square had fewer entrances. In today’s fragmented ecosystem, his point reads less like nostalgia and more like a warning: if journalists outsource judgment to the loudest actors, they don’t become fairer; they become useful. The quote’s power is its refusal to romanticize transparency. Not everything that can be aired deserves to be.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List

