"But the single overwhelming reason why jails are bursting is longer sentences given for more crimes"
About this Quote
Toynbee’s line is built to puncture a comforting myth: that “bursting” jails are the natural byproduct of social collapse or uniquely criminal times. By calling the cause “single” and “overwhelming,” she strips away the usual fog of explanations - migration, moral decline, policing failure - and points to something far less cinematic and far more politically owned: policy choices about punishment.
The phrasing does two kinds of work. “Jails are bursting” is vivid, almost tabloid, borrowing the language of crisis that law-and-order campaigns love. Then she flips that same crisis framing against its authors: the system is crowded because the system decided to keep people longer and to criminalize more behavior. “Longer sentences given for more crimes” is deliberately unromantic, bureaucratic even, which is the point. It implies that incarceration rates aren’t a weather report; they’re an administrative output.
The subtext is a rebuke to bipartisan posturing. If overcrowding is mostly driven by sentence inflation and expanded criminal statutes, then tough-on-crime politics can’t claim innocence when prisons overflow. It’s also a critique of what gets treated as “public safety”: punishment as default, expansion as reflex, and severity as proof of seriousness.
Context matters here: Britain’s recurring prison-capacity panics, the ratcheting up of sentencing guidelines, and periodic creation of new offences all feed a cycle where “crisis” becomes a justification for building more cells rather than rethinking who needs to be there, and for how long. Toynbee is trying to make the crowding scandal legible as a choice - and therefore changeable.
The phrasing does two kinds of work. “Jails are bursting” is vivid, almost tabloid, borrowing the language of crisis that law-and-order campaigns love. Then she flips that same crisis framing against its authors: the system is crowded because the system decided to keep people longer and to criminalize more behavior. “Longer sentences given for more crimes” is deliberately unromantic, bureaucratic even, which is the point. It implies that incarceration rates aren’t a weather report; they’re an administrative output.
The subtext is a rebuke to bipartisan posturing. If overcrowding is mostly driven by sentence inflation and expanded criminal statutes, then tough-on-crime politics can’t claim innocence when prisons overflow. It’s also a critique of what gets treated as “public safety”: punishment as default, expansion as reflex, and severity as proof of seriousness.
Context matters here: Britain’s recurring prison-capacity panics, the ratcheting up of sentencing guidelines, and periodic creation of new offences all feed a cycle where “crisis” becomes a justification for building more cells rather than rethinking who needs to be there, and for how long. Toynbee is trying to make the crowding scandal legible as a choice - and therefore changeable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Polly
Add to List






