"But to understand what it means to be strong and courageous, Christians should look to the person of Christ"
About this Quote
Strength and courage, Olasky implies, are being misdefined in public Christian life - too often borrowed from politics, masculinity branding, or hustle-era self-help. His sentence is a gentle corrective with a sharp edge: if Christians need a model, they should stop shopping for archetypes and return to the one their faith already centers. The verb choice matters. Not “look to Christ’s teachings” or “look to the Bible,” but “look to the person of Christ.” That move shifts the argument from abstraction to embodiment. Strength is not a slogan; it’s a life.
The subtext is a rebuke of performative toughness. In contemporary American Christianity, “strong” can mean combative: winning culture-war skirmishes, projecting certainty, refusing compromise. Olasky’s Christ, by contrast, is strong in ways that don’t flatter the ego: restraint under insult, courage without theatrics, authority expressed through service. The line quietly insists that courage is not the absence of vulnerability; it’s the willingness to absorb cost for others without turning pain into spectacle.
Contextually, Olasky has long operated in the ecosystem of evangelical public thought, where debates over power, public witness, and moral credibility are constant. His phrasing reads like an intervention inside that community: a reminder that Christian identity isn’t validated by proximity to strongmen or by rhetorical swagger, but by resemblance to a figure whose most decisive “strength” was paradoxical - triumph achieved through surrender. The intent isn’t to soften Christianity into niceness; it’s to re-anchor its definition of bravery in a cruciform center.
The subtext is a rebuke of performative toughness. In contemporary American Christianity, “strong” can mean combative: winning culture-war skirmishes, projecting certainty, refusing compromise. Olasky’s Christ, by contrast, is strong in ways that don’t flatter the ego: restraint under insult, courage without theatrics, authority expressed through service. The line quietly insists that courage is not the absence of vulnerability; it’s the willingness to absorb cost for others without turning pain into spectacle.
Contextually, Olasky has long operated in the ecosystem of evangelical public thought, where debates over power, public witness, and moral credibility are constant. His phrasing reads like an intervention inside that community: a reminder that Christian identity isn’t validated by proximity to strongmen or by rhetorical swagger, but by resemblance to a figure whose most decisive “strength” was paradoxical - triumph achieved through surrender. The intent isn’t to soften Christianity into niceness; it’s to re-anchor its definition of bravery in a cruciform center.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Marvin
Add to List









