"But we made a decision based on the fact that we have been up there a long time and that we feel that the seniority is important to the people of Louisiana"
About this Quote
Seniority becomes, in John Breaux's telling, less a procedural fact than a moral credential - a kind of political compound interest that Louisiana has been patiently earning. The line is engineered to make an inside-baseball advantage sound like a public good, translating Washington’s committee hierarchies into something voters can feel in their bones: clout, leverage, the ability to bring home results. It’s a justification that flatters constituents without promising anything too concrete, which is precisely why it works.
The specific intent is defensive and preemptive. “We made a decision” signals deliberation over impulse, while “we have been up there a long time” invites the audience to interpret longevity not as careerism but as service. Breaux’s key move is the pivot from self to state: seniority isn’t important to him; it’s “important to the people of Louisiana.” That rhetorical handoff launders personal incumbency into collective benefit, framing any threat to his tenure - a challenger, term limits, anti-Washington sentiment - as a threat to Louisiana’s standing.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to reform-minded skepticism. If you’re tempted by freshness or outsider energy, Breaux implies, you may be voting away influence. This is the classic late-20th-century senator’s argument, especially potent in an era when federal dollars, infrastructure projects, and regulatory carve-outs were often brokered through relationships and committee power. It’s a pitch for pragmatism over purity: keep the seat, keep the muscle.
The specific intent is defensive and preemptive. “We made a decision” signals deliberation over impulse, while “we have been up there a long time” invites the audience to interpret longevity not as careerism but as service. Breaux’s key move is the pivot from self to state: seniority isn’t important to him; it’s “important to the people of Louisiana.” That rhetorical handoff launders personal incumbency into collective benefit, framing any threat to his tenure - a challenger, term limits, anti-Washington sentiment - as a threat to Louisiana’s standing.
The subtext is a quiet rebuke to reform-minded skepticism. If you’re tempted by freshness or outsider energy, Breaux implies, you may be voting away influence. This is the classic late-20th-century senator’s argument, especially potent in an era when federal dollars, infrastructure projects, and regulatory carve-outs were often brokered through relationships and committee power. It’s a pitch for pragmatism over purity: keep the seat, keep the muscle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List



