"By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out"
About this Quote
Dawkins lands the punchline with a vaudeville image: open-mindedness taken so literally that the skull can no longer hold its contents. The joke is doing real argumentative work. It flatters a modern self-image - curious, tolerant, evidence-driven - then draws a hard boundary around it: openness is a method, not a mood. You stay receptive to new ideas, but you don’t waive the entry requirements.
The specific intent is defensive and polemical. Dawkins is warning against what he sees as the cultural prestige of credulity: the way “keeping an open mind” gets invoked to grant fringe claims (creationism, faith healing, pseudoscience, conspiracism) a seat at the grown-ups’ table. The subtext is that some debates aren’t noble clashes of perspectives; they’re asymmetrical contests between evidence and desire. Treating every claim as equally plausible doesn’t make you fair. It makes you easy to sell to.
Context matters because Dawkins’ public career is built around a particular anxiety: that in liberal societies, politeness can become a loophole through which untestable beliefs smuggle themselves into science classrooms and public policy. The line is also a rebuke to a certain kind of relativism - the posture that skepticism is just another “bias.” By choosing a crude, bodily metaphor, he sidesteps technical epistemology and hits a more visceral nerve: there’s a point where tolerance becomes self-negation.
It works because it redefines “closed-minded” as a smear used by people who want immunity from scrutiny, while casting disciplined doubt as the true form of intellectual hygiene.
The specific intent is defensive and polemical. Dawkins is warning against what he sees as the cultural prestige of credulity: the way “keeping an open mind” gets invoked to grant fringe claims (creationism, faith healing, pseudoscience, conspiracism) a seat at the grown-ups’ table. The subtext is that some debates aren’t noble clashes of perspectives; they’re asymmetrical contests between evidence and desire. Treating every claim as equally plausible doesn’t make you fair. It makes you easy to sell to.
Context matters because Dawkins’ public career is built around a particular anxiety: that in liberal societies, politeness can become a loophole through which untestable beliefs smuggle themselves into science classrooms and public policy. The line is also a rebuke to a certain kind of relativism - the posture that skepticism is just another “bias.” By choosing a crude, bodily metaphor, he sidesteps technical epistemology and hits a more visceral nerve: there’s a point where tolerance becomes self-negation.
It works because it redefines “closed-minded” as a smear used by people who want immunity from scrutiny, while casting disciplined doubt as the true form of intellectual hygiene.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List





