"By creating a Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District, we will give local governments a framework for working together on an issue that affects our whole state"
About this Quote
A bureaucratic mouthful like "Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District" isn’t just policy; it’s political choreography. Roy Barnes is selling coordination without triggering the reflexive backlash that words like "mandate" or "state control" would invite in a region where local autonomy is practically a civic religion. The verb choice matters: "creating" sounds constructive and neutral, not corrective. "Give local governments a framework" flatters mayors and county commissions by casting them as the protagonists, while quietly acknowledging they haven’t been able to solve this alone.
The subtext is scarcity and inevitability. Water is the kind of resource problem that turns growth narratives into zero-sum fights, especially in fast-expanding North Georgia where development, drought cycles, and upstream-downstream tensions collide. Barnes frames water as "an issue that affects our whole state" to elevate it beyond metropolitan squabbles. That phrase performs a neat political trick: it invites rural and southern Georgia to see Atlanta’s water planning as their business too, reducing the optics of a metro carve-out and hinting at statewide stakes like agriculture, industry, and inter-basin disputes.
"Working together" is doing heavy lifting. It signals that the real obstacle is fragmentation: dozens of jurisdictions competing, duplicating, or free-riding. A "district" offers a middle path between doing nothing and imposing a top-down solution, creating a venue where cooperation can be enforced politely - through planning, data, and shared rules - while letting everyone claim they kept local control.
The subtext is scarcity and inevitability. Water is the kind of resource problem that turns growth narratives into zero-sum fights, especially in fast-expanding North Georgia where development, drought cycles, and upstream-downstream tensions collide. Barnes frames water as "an issue that affects our whole state" to elevate it beyond metropolitan squabbles. That phrase performs a neat political trick: it invites rural and southern Georgia to see Atlanta’s water planning as their business too, reducing the optics of a metro carve-out and hinting at statewide stakes like agriculture, industry, and inter-basin disputes.
"Working together" is doing heavy lifting. It signals that the real obstacle is fragmentation: dozens of jurisdictions competing, duplicating, or free-riding. A "district" offers a middle path between doing nothing and imposing a top-down solution, creating a venue where cooperation can be enforced politely - through planning, data, and shared rules - while letting everyone claim they kept local control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Roy
Add to List
