"By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox"
About this Quote
A paradox is only impressive until you notice it’s being propped up by ignorance. Galileo’s line lands like a clean, almost impatient diagnosis: if you refuse the basic rules of evidence, you can make reality say anything. The intent isn’t to admire paradox but to expose it as a cheap trick when it’s untethered from scientific principle. Denial is a superpower for the unserious.
The subtext is sharper than the surface. Galileo isn’t arguing that science is just another opinion in the marketplace of ideas; he’s warning that once you grant “no shared method for deciding what’s true,” you’ve effectively legalized nonsense. Paradox becomes infinitely manufacturable. You can defend astrology with the same confidence as astronomy, miracle cures with the same swagger as medicine. The quote anticipates a modern media pathology: if you discredit the referee, every foul becomes “debatable.”
Context gives it bite. Galileo worked in an era when observation and mathematics were colliding head-on with institutional authority and inherited cosmologies. His telescopic evidence for a heliocentric universe wasn’t merely a technical dispute; it threatened a whole structure of intellectual and theological control. “Denying scientific principles” here isn’t abstract skepticism; it’s strategy, a way for power to preserve itself by refusing the court where it might lose.
What makes the sentence work is its cold economy. It doesn’t plead for science’s nobility. It simply notes the consequence: abandon the discipline of proof, and you can keep any contradiction alive indefinitely.
The subtext is sharper than the surface. Galileo isn’t arguing that science is just another opinion in the marketplace of ideas; he’s warning that once you grant “no shared method for deciding what’s true,” you’ve effectively legalized nonsense. Paradox becomes infinitely manufacturable. You can defend astrology with the same confidence as astronomy, miracle cures with the same swagger as medicine. The quote anticipates a modern media pathology: if you discredit the referee, every foul becomes “debatable.”
Context gives it bite. Galileo worked in an era when observation and mathematics were colliding head-on with institutional authority and inherited cosmologies. His telescopic evidence for a heliocentric universe wasn’t merely a technical dispute; it threatened a whole structure of intellectual and theological control. “Denying scientific principles” here isn’t abstract skepticism; it’s strategy, a way for power to preserve itself by refusing the court where it might lose.
What makes the sentence work is its cold economy. It doesn’t plead for science’s nobility. It simply notes the consequence: abandon the discipline of proof, and you can keep any contradiction alive indefinitely.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Galileo
Add to List


