"By ending the Hussein regime, the United States has taken away yet another incubator of terrorism"
About this Quote
The line is built like a victory lap, but it’s really an argument disguised as a fait accompli. “By ending the Hussein regime” frames the Iraq invasion as a clean, completed act of removal, not a contested war with messy legality and mounting costs. The verb “ending” is careful: it sanitizes violence into administration, as if toppling a state were akin to closing a failed program.
Calling Saddam’s Iraq an “incubator of terrorism” does more than label an enemy; it shifts causality. An incubator is a machine that passively produces life. Terrorism, in this framing, isn’t a political strategy with grievances, funding networks, and opportunistic recruitment; it’s a biological output of the wrong regime. That metaphor helps the speaker sell a policy premise Americans wanted to believe in the early 2000s: remove the source, reduce the symptom. The phrase “yet another” widens the claim into a pattern, suggesting post-9/11 U.S. action is steadily sterilizing the world of terror factories.
The subtext is aimed at domestic skepticism. In 2003-2006, as evidence for WMD claims collapsed and the insurgency grew, advocates needed a fallback justification: even if the intelligence was wrong, the outcome was still protective. This sentence tries to preempt doubt by converting invasion into prevention.
History makes the line land with bitter irony. Iraq didn’t just fail to stop terrorism; the power vacuum and sectarian collapse became a recruitment engine, helping catalyze groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq and, later, ISIS. The quote’s rhetorical neatness is exactly what reality refused to be.
Calling Saddam’s Iraq an “incubator of terrorism” does more than label an enemy; it shifts causality. An incubator is a machine that passively produces life. Terrorism, in this framing, isn’t a political strategy with grievances, funding networks, and opportunistic recruitment; it’s a biological output of the wrong regime. That metaphor helps the speaker sell a policy premise Americans wanted to believe in the early 2000s: remove the source, reduce the symptom. The phrase “yet another” widens the claim into a pattern, suggesting post-9/11 U.S. action is steadily sterilizing the world of terror factories.
The subtext is aimed at domestic skepticism. In 2003-2006, as evidence for WMD claims collapsed and the insurgency grew, advocates needed a fallback justification: even if the intelligence was wrong, the outcome was still protective. This sentence tries to preempt doubt by converting invasion into prevention.
History makes the line land with bitter irony. Iraq didn’t just fail to stop terrorism; the power vacuum and sectarian collapse became a recruitment engine, helping catalyze groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq and, later, ISIS. The quote’s rhetorical neatness is exactly what reality refused to be.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List

