"By helping readers understand these mechanics, I hope they will appreciate why freedom is for everyone, why it is essential for our security and why the free world plays a critically important role in advancing democracy around the globe"
About this Quote
Sharansky is doing something slyly strategic here: he’s not merely praising “freedom,” he’s selling it as infrastructure. The key word is “mechanics,” which frames liberty not as a sentimental value but as a system with moving parts - incentives, institutions, and pressure points that either protect dissent or suffocate it. That technocratic register is the rhetorical bridge he needs for readers who’ve grown wary of lofty democracy-talk: don’t take my word for it, he implies; watch how the machine works.
The sentence is also a carefully stitched coalition. “For everyone” answers the charge of hypocrisy (freedom as a selective Western export). “Essential for our security” is the hard-nosed appeal to audiences who might not care about rights until rights are rebranded as risk management. That pivot is classic Sharansky: he argues that dictatorship doesn’t stay domestic; repression metastasizes into instability, aggression, corruption, and refugee flows. Freedom becomes not charity but prevention.
Then comes the phrase with the most ideological weight: “the free world.” It’s a throwback Cold War term, but in Sharansky’s mouth it’s less nostalgia than a moral map. The subtext is that democracies are a club with obligations; neutrality is complicity, and isolationism is a luxury bought with someone else’s courage. Coming from a former Soviet dissident, the context matters: this is the worldview of someone who watched “security” used as a pretext to crush speech, then turns the argument around. He’s not romanticizing democracy; he’s insisting it has operational advantages - and that the cost of forgetting that is paid globally.
The sentence is also a carefully stitched coalition. “For everyone” answers the charge of hypocrisy (freedom as a selective Western export). “Essential for our security” is the hard-nosed appeal to audiences who might not care about rights until rights are rebranded as risk management. That pivot is classic Sharansky: he argues that dictatorship doesn’t stay domestic; repression metastasizes into instability, aggression, corruption, and refugee flows. Freedom becomes not charity but prevention.
Then comes the phrase with the most ideological weight: “the free world.” It’s a throwback Cold War term, but in Sharansky’s mouth it’s less nostalgia than a moral map. The subtext is that democracies are a club with obligations; neutrality is complicity, and isolationism is a luxury bought with someone else’s courage. Coming from a former Soviet dissident, the context matters: this is the worldview of someone who watched “security” used as a pretext to crush speech, then turns the argument around. He’s not romanticizing democracy; he’s insisting it has operational advantages - and that the cost of forgetting that is paid globally.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Natan
Add to List








