"Can you not see that women could do and would do a hundred times more for the slave, if she were not fettered?"
About this Quote
Grimke’s line is a pressure-point disguised as a question. “Can you not see” doesn’t invite debate so much as expose willful blindness in her audience, many of whom could stomach anti-slavery sentiment in the abstract while keeping women safely ornamental in practice. The sentence sets up a deliberately explosive comparison: the enslaved are in chains, but so are the women being asked to help them. “Fettered” is the hinge word - a term pulled from slavery’s physical vocabulary and snapped onto the legal and social restraints of nineteenth-century womanhood.
The specific intent is tactical as much as moral. Grimke is arguing that abolition will be weaker, slower, and more hypocritical if half the population is forced into silence. The “hundred times more” is not a statistic; it’s a dare. She’s insisting that women’s empathy and labor are already being used - in church circles, benevolent societies, boycotts, petition drives - but only within boundaries set by men who claim to oppose tyranny elsewhere.
The subtext is sharper: if you accept the premise that some people must be restrained “for the public good,” you’ve already internalized the logic that props up slavery. Grimke, speaking as an activist who defied norms by lecturing publicly, turns the spotlight on abolitionist respectability politics. Freedom isn’t a single-issue cause; it’s a contagious principle. If you don’t let women act, you don’t just hobble them - you hobble the slave’s prospects, and you reveal how partial your conscience really is.
The specific intent is tactical as much as moral. Grimke is arguing that abolition will be weaker, slower, and more hypocritical if half the population is forced into silence. The “hundred times more” is not a statistic; it’s a dare. She’s insisting that women’s empathy and labor are already being used - in church circles, benevolent societies, boycotts, petition drives - but only within boundaries set by men who claim to oppose tyranny elsewhere.
The subtext is sharper: if you accept the premise that some people must be restrained “for the public good,” you’ve already internalized the logic that props up slavery. Grimke, speaking as an activist who defied norms by lecturing publicly, turns the spotlight on abolitionist respectability politics. Freedom isn’t a single-issue cause; it’s a contagious principle. If you don’t let women act, you don’t just hobble them - you hobble the slave’s prospects, and you reveal how partial your conscience really is.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Angelina
Add to List


