"Canada has always been a strong supporter of China's accession to the WTO... We look forward to playing a constructive role in helping complete China's accession"
About this Quote
Diplomacy often sounds like applause, even when it is really leverage. Pettigrew’s line is built to reassure Beijing while signaling Ottawa’s preferred version of “integration”: China welcomed into the rule-bound club of global trade, with Canada positioned as the helpful adult in the room. The repeated “constructive” framing is doing heavy work. It’s not just friendly; it’s an implicit argument that China’s rise can be managed, shaped, and domesticated through institutions like the WTO - and that Canada can earn influence by being an early, enthusiastic enabler.
The subtext is transactional. “Strong supporter” advertises Canada as a reliable partner to Chinese policymakers at a moment when market access was the real prize, both for Chinese exporters and for Canadian firms hungry for a massive new consumer base. The language avoids moral or political friction by design: no talk of labor, human rights, or security, because the goal is to keep the agenda narrowed to trade rules and commercial opportunity. In that sense, it’s a classic late-1990s/early-2000s globalization posture: the belief that economic interdependence would produce convergence, or at least predictability.
Context sharpens the intent. China’s WTO accession (completed in 2001) was a once-in-a-generation restructuring of the world economy. Canada, a mid-sized power dependent on exports, had every incentive to be seen as useful rather than skeptical. “Helping complete” is also a subtle claim to relevance: not just cheering from the sidelines, but participating in the architecture of China’s entry - and, by implication, earning the right to complain later if China doesn’t play by the rules.
The subtext is transactional. “Strong supporter” advertises Canada as a reliable partner to Chinese policymakers at a moment when market access was the real prize, both for Chinese exporters and for Canadian firms hungry for a massive new consumer base. The language avoids moral or political friction by design: no talk of labor, human rights, or security, because the goal is to keep the agenda narrowed to trade rules and commercial opportunity. In that sense, it’s a classic late-1990s/early-2000s globalization posture: the belief that economic interdependence would produce convergence, or at least predictability.
Context sharpens the intent. China’s WTO accession (completed in 2001) was a once-in-a-generation restructuring of the world economy. Canada, a mid-sized power dependent on exports, had every incentive to be seen as useful rather than skeptical. “Helping complete” is also a subtle claim to relevance: not just cheering from the sidelines, but participating in the architecture of China’s entry - and, by implication, earning the right to complain later if China doesn’t play by the rules.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Pierre
Add to List


