"Canada has great natural resources, and its people have the spirit and ability to develop them"
About this Quote
“Canada has great natural resources” is the easy part; the sharper move is the pivot to “its people have the spirit and ability to develop them.” Charles E. Wilson, a mid-century corporate titan, isn’t admiring Canada in the abstract. He’s sketching a business case in the flattering language of national character. The sentence fuses geology with psychology: riches in the ground are inert until paired with a workforce and managerial culture willing to turn forests, ore, and oil into profits and geopolitical leverage.
The intent reads like an investor’s reassurance wrapped as a compliment. “Spirit” signals discipline, optimism, and social buy-in; “ability” signals technical skill, institutions, and capital. Together, they smooth over the messy parts of extraction: labor conflict, Indigenous land claims, environmental cost, and the political bargaining that determines who benefits. Development is presented as natural destiny rather than contested choice.
Context matters. Wilson came of age when North American industry treated resource frontiers as strategic assets, and when Canada’s postwar identity was bound up with modernization: hydroelectric megaprojects, mining booms, pipeline dreams, and a growing partnership (and tension) with U.S. capital. In that era, praising Canada’s “ability” also nudged it toward a particular model of growth: export-oriented, infrastructure-heavy, friendly to corporate expertise.
What makes the line work is its quiet coercion. It invites Canadians to see extraction not as one possible path, but as the responsible expression of national virtue. If you have the resources and the “spirit,” what excuse do you have not to develop them?
The intent reads like an investor’s reassurance wrapped as a compliment. “Spirit” signals discipline, optimism, and social buy-in; “ability” signals technical skill, institutions, and capital. Together, they smooth over the messy parts of extraction: labor conflict, Indigenous land claims, environmental cost, and the political bargaining that determines who benefits. Development is presented as natural destiny rather than contested choice.
Context matters. Wilson came of age when North American industry treated resource frontiers as strategic assets, and when Canada’s postwar identity was bound up with modernization: hydroelectric megaprojects, mining booms, pipeline dreams, and a growing partnership (and tension) with U.S. capital. In that era, praising Canada’s “ability” also nudged it toward a particular model of growth: export-oriented, infrastructure-heavy, friendly to corporate expertise.
What makes the line work is its quiet coercion. It invites Canadians to see extraction not as one possible path, but as the responsible expression of national virtue. If you have the resources and the “spirit,” what excuse do you have not to develop them?
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List





