"Cap the well, yes. Clear up the mess, yes. Make compensation - yes, absolutely. But would it be right to have legislation that independently targets BP rather than other companies? I don't think that - would be right"
About this Quote
Cameron’s triple “yes” is a politician’s pressure-release valve: an incantation designed to sound morally certain while buying room to maneuver. “Cap the well… Clear up the mess… Make compensation” hits the public’s basic demand for accountability after a catastrophe, delivered in clipped, managerial verbs. He’s aligning himself with outrage without ever inhabiting it. Then comes the pivot that matters: the sudden scruple about “legislation that independently targets BP.” It’s the language of fairness, but it’s also the language of insulation.
The intent is to draw a bright line between punishment and principle. Cameron wants to be seen as tough on the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon disaster, yet wary of creating a precedent where governments single out a specific firm. That’s not just abstract rule-of-law talk; it’s a message aimed at investors and the broader corporate ecosystem that the state won’t turn crisis into bespoke vengeance. The subtext is Britain’s awkward position: BP wasn’t only a villain in the headlines, it was a national champion with jobs, pensions, and tax revenue wrapped around its brand. Going too hard, too specifically, risks collateral damage at home.
The quote’s awkward self-interruption (“I don’t think that - would be right”) gives away the tightrope. He’s speaking in the key of moral balance while negotiating political reality: satisfy an angry public, avoid spooking markets, and preserve the idea that even a hated corporation is entitled to procedural neutrality. It’s accountability, carefully de-personalized.
The intent is to draw a bright line between punishment and principle. Cameron wants to be seen as tough on the company responsible for the Deepwater Horizon disaster, yet wary of creating a precedent where governments single out a specific firm. That’s not just abstract rule-of-law talk; it’s a message aimed at investors and the broader corporate ecosystem that the state won’t turn crisis into bespoke vengeance. The subtext is Britain’s awkward position: BP wasn’t only a villain in the headlines, it was a national champion with jobs, pensions, and tax revenue wrapped around its brand. Going too hard, too specifically, risks collateral damage at home.
The quote’s awkward self-interruption (“I don’t think that - would be right”) gives away the tightrope. He’s speaking in the key of moral balance while negotiating political reality: satisfy an angry public, avoid spooking markets, and preserve the idea that even a hated corporation is entitled to procedural neutrality. It’s accountability, carefully de-personalized.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List
