"Capitalism should not be condemned, since we haven't had capitalism"
About this Quote
Ron Paul’s line is a neat rhetorical judo move: it doesn’t defend capitalism by praising it, it defends capitalism by declaring it absent. The trick is definitional. If “real” capitalism has never existed, then every popular indictment of capitalism - bailouts, monopolies, cronyism, stagnant wages, shattered towns - can be refiled as evidence against a counterfeit system: “corporatism,” “crony capitalism,” an unholy blend of state power and private privilege. That move preserves the purity of the ideal while quarantining the mess of history.
The intent is both moral and tactical. Moral, because Paul’s worldview treats voluntary exchange as legitimate and coercion as the original sin; tactical, because it shifts the debate from outcomes to authenticity. You’re not arguing about whether markets fail or whether inequality corrodes democracy; you’re arguing about whether the label fits. It’s a debate-ending maneuver disguised as an opening question.
The subtext is a warning about power: big government doesn’t restrain big business, it manufactures it. In Paul’s libertarian frame, regulation becomes a tool for incumbents, monetary policy a hidden tax, and bailouts a rigged casino where losses are socialized and gains privatized. This was especially potent in the post-2008 climate, when disgust at Wall Street and Washington briefly rhymed across the left-right divide.
What makes the line work is its plausibility. America plainly isn’t a free-market Eden; it’s a dense web of subsidies, patents, barriers to entry, and revolving doors. Paul’s sentence weaponizes that complexity into a simple absolution: don’t condemn capitalism for sins committed by a system that only wears its name.
The intent is both moral and tactical. Moral, because Paul’s worldview treats voluntary exchange as legitimate and coercion as the original sin; tactical, because it shifts the debate from outcomes to authenticity. You’re not arguing about whether markets fail or whether inequality corrodes democracy; you’re arguing about whether the label fits. It’s a debate-ending maneuver disguised as an opening question.
The subtext is a warning about power: big government doesn’t restrain big business, it manufactures it. In Paul’s libertarian frame, regulation becomes a tool for incumbents, monetary policy a hidden tax, and bailouts a rigged casino where losses are socialized and gains privatized. This was especially potent in the post-2008 climate, when disgust at Wall Street and Washington briefly rhymed across the left-right divide.
What makes the line work is its plausibility. America plainly isn’t a free-market Eden; it’s a dense web of subsidies, patents, barriers to entry, and revolving doors. Paul’s sentence weaponizes that complexity into a simple absolution: don’t condemn capitalism for sins committed by a system that only wears its name.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List

