"Caring for but never trying to own may be a further way to define friendship"
About this Quote
Friendship, Glasser implies, isn’t love with a deed attached. It’s intimacy without the receipt. The phrase “caring for but never trying to own” draws a hard line between attachment and possession, a line modern relationships blur constantly under the rhetoric of “my person,” constant access, and emotional exclusivity. He’s not romanticizing distance; he’s naming a discipline: to stay invested in someone’s wellbeing while resisting the urge to control their choices, time, or identity.
Glasser’s background as a psychologist matters here because he’s quietly diagnosing a common relational failure: turning people into projects. “Own” is doing heavy psychological work. It points to the ways we convert affection into entitlement - expecting responsiveness on demand, policing other friendships, interpreting autonomy as rejection. In that framing, friendship becomes a test of security. If you can’t tolerate a friend’s separateness, you don’t have closeness; you have leverage.
The subtext is also a critique of transactional care. “Caring for” suggests steadiness, attention, even responsibility, but not a contract. It’s care that doesn’t keep score, doesn’t require exclusivity, doesn’t try to “fix” someone into a more convenient version. Coming from a 20th-century therapeutic context, it echoes a shift from authority-driven relationships to ones built on choice and mutual respect: you can influence a friend, you can show up, you can even disagree sharply - but the moment your care becomes a bid for ownership, it stops being friendship and starts being control with good PR.
Glasser’s background as a psychologist matters here because he’s quietly diagnosing a common relational failure: turning people into projects. “Own” is doing heavy psychological work. It points to the ways we convert affection into entitlement - expecting responsiveness on demand, policing other friendships, interpreting autonomy as rejection. In that framing, friendship becomes a test of security. If you can’t tolerate a friend’s separateness, you don’t have closeness; you have leverage.
The subtext is also a critique of transactional care. “Caring for” suggests steadiness, attention, even responsibility, but not a contract. It’s care that doesn’t keep score, doesn’t require exclusivity, doesn’t try to “fix” someone into a more convenient version. Coming from a 20th-century therapeutic context, it echoes a shift from authority-driven relationships to ones built on choice and mutual respect: you can influence a friend, you can show up, you can even disagree sharply - but the moment your care becomes a bid for ownership, it stops being friendship and starts being control with good PR.
Quote Details
| Topic | Friendship |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List








