"Censorship is advertising paid by the government"
About this Quote
Fellini flips the usual moral panic about censorship into a shrewd media critique: suppression doesn’t erase art, it spotlights it. Calling censorship “advertising” is a deliberately commercial insult, reducing the state’s lofty claims of protecting public order or virtue to the grubby mechanics of hype. The word “paid” sharpens the joke. Governments don’t just ban; they subsidize attention with police time, court hearings, headlines, and the implicit promise that what’s being hidden must be potent.
The subtext is especially Felliniesque: authority and spectacle are collaborators, even when they pretend to be enemies. In his Italy - shaped by Fascism’s recent memory and the postwar power of church-influenced moral gatekeeping - public scandal often functioned as distribution. A film “condemned” by officials could arrive pre-validated as dangerous, modern, and worth seeing. The censors become unwilling publicists, and the audience becomes a consumer trained to chase the forbidden.
It also carries a creator’s irritation with being “protected” from his own viewers. Fellini isn’t arguing that censorship is harmless; he’s arguing it’s self-defeating and faintly ridiculous, a bureaucracy that inadvertently strengthens the very cultural currents it fears. Read now, the line lands as an early diagnosis of the Streisand effect before it had a name: attempts to control narrative in a mass media environment often end up amplifying it, because outrage and prohibition are just another marketing channel - only with taxpayer funding and moral theater.
The subtext is especially Felliniesque: authority and spectacle are collaborators, even when they pretend to be enemies. In his Italy - shaped by Fascism’s recent memory and the postwar power of church-influenced moral gatekeeping - public scandal often functioned as distribution. A film “condemned” by officials could arrive pre-validated as dangerous, modern, and worth seeing. The censors become unwilling publicists, and the audience becomes a consumer trained to chase the forbidden.
It also carries a creator’s irritation with being “protected” from his own viewers. Fellini isn’t arguing that censorship is harmless; he’s arguing it’s self-defeating and faintly ridiculous, a bureaucracy that inadvertently strengthens the very cultural currents it fears. Read now, the line lands as an early diagnosis of the Streisand effect before it had a name: attempts to control narrative in a mass media environment often end up amplifying it, because outrage and prohibition are just another marketing channel - only with taxpayer funding and moral theater.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Federico
Add to List


