Life & Wisdom Quote by Susan Blackmore

Blackmore’s move here is to puncture the totalizing temptation of meme-talk. In a culture that treats “meme” as a master key for everything from politics to personality, she draws a hard boundary: yes, our thoughts and behaviors are steeped in inherited patterns, but raw perception isn’t automatically one of them. The tree is doing a lot of work. It’s an almost aggressively ordinary object, chosen to force the reader away from screens, slogans, and social contagions and back into embodied cognition: light hits retina, the brain assembles a scene. No replication required.

The intent is partly defensive. Memetics has always faced the critique that it’s an overextended metaphor - Darwinism with vibes - that explains so much it ends up explaining nothing. By conceding limits, Blackmore makes the broader claim more credible: memes may shape interpretation, attention, and what we say about the tree (“nature,” “property value,” “climate grief”), but they don’t generate the baseline perceptual machinery that lets “tree” appear at all.

The subtext is a warning about category error. Modern discourse loves collapsing experience into discourse about experience, mistaking the social layer for the whole stack. Blackmore is insisting on levels: sensation, cognition, culture. In doing so, she also protects a sliver of non-memetic reality - not mystical truth, just pre-cultural processing - that keeps memetics from becoming a closed system. It’s a rhetorical hedge, but also an ethical one: if everything is a meme, nothing is accountable, and nothing is real.