"Certainly there have been better actors than me who have had no careers. Why? I don't know"
About this Quote
The subtext is a quiet indictment of how stardom is manufactured. Gere doesn’t name the usual suspects (timing, looks, agents, studio politics, marketable mystique) because naming them would imply a clean causal chain, a comfortingly rational story. “Why? I don’t know” rejects that. It’s not anti-intellectual; it’s anti-fable. The randomness is the truth he’s willing to say out loud.
Context matters: Gere is a face of a particular era of American masculinity and romantic leading-man cinema. His career benefited from a cultural fit - the right kind of charisma, at the right time, packaged for mass distribution. This quote reads like someone aware that fame isn’t a medal awarded by a jury; it’s a weather system. You can be talented, even brilliant, and still never get the forecast that makes you visible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Career |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Gere, Richard. (2026, January 15). Certainly there have been better actors than me who have had no careers. Why? I don't know. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/certainly-there-have-been-better-actors-than-me-147883/
Chicago Style
Gere, Richard. "Certainly there have been better actors than me who have had no careers. Why? I don't know." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/certainly-there-have-been-better-actors-than-me-147883/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Certainly there have been better actors than me who have had no careers. Why? I don't know." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/certainly-there-have-been-better-actors-than-me-147883/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



