"Childhood obesity is best tackled at home through improved parental involvement, increased physical exercise, better diet and restraint from eating"
About this Quote
“Best tackled at home” is doing the heavy lifting here, turning a public-health crisis into a private household management problem. Filner’s phrasing carries the familiar politician’s promise of common sense: parents, exercise, diet, restraint. It reads like a checklist you could print on a refrigerator, which is exactly the point. By making the solution sound straightforward, he positions himself on the side of responsibility rather than bureaucracy, an elected official endorsing “family values” without saying the phrase.
The subtext is a subtle shift of liability. Obesity becomes less about food deserts, school lunch budgets, advertising aimed at kids, or the economics of cheap calories, and more about parental vigilance and individual willpower. “Improved parental involvement” implies a deficit at home; “restraint from eating” frames the body as a site of discipline, not circumstance. The language smuggles in moral evaluation: good families supervise, good children control themselves.
Context matters because Filner operated in the American political arena where public health is perpetually filtered through debates about personal freedom and government overreach. Emphasizing the home signals caution about state intervention, even when the drivers of childhood obesity are often structural and commercial. It’s a defensible stance rhetorically because it flatters the audience’s desire for agency. It also risks sounding like blame dressed up as empowerment, especially to parents juggling multiple jobs, unsafe neighborhoods, or limited access to fresh food. The line works by being unarguable in principle while sidestepping the messy question of who built the environment kids are eating in.
The subtext is a subtle shift of liability. Obesity becomes less about food deserts, school lunch budgets, advertising aimed at kids, or the economics of cheap calories, and more about parental vigilance and individual willpower. “Improved parental involvement” implies a deficit at home; “restraint from eating” frames the body as a site of discipline, not circumstance. The language smuggles in moral evaluation: good families supervise, good children control themselves.
Context matters because Filner operated in the American political arena where public health is perpetually filtered through debates about personal freedom and government overreach. Emphasizing the home signals caution about state intervention, even when the drivers of childhood obesity are often structural and commercial. It’s a defensible stance rhetorically because it flatters the audience’s desire for agency. It also risks sounding like blame dressed up as empowerment, especially to parents juggling multiple jobs, unsafe neighborhoods, or limited access to fresh food. The line works by being unarguable in principle while sidestepping the messy question of who built the environment kids are eating in.
Quote Details
| Topic | Parenting |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List





