"Christ has not only ordained that there shall be such officers in his Church - he has not only specified their duties and prerogatives - but he gives the requisite qualifications, and calls those thus qualified, and by that call gives them their official authority"
About this Quote
Authority, in Charles Hodge's telling, is not negotiated; it's issued. The sentence stacks its clauses like a legal brief, building a chain of custody for church leadership that runs straight from Christ to the officer's desk. Ordained. Specified. Gives. Calls. Gives again. The repetition is the point: Hodge isn't merely describing ecclesiastical order, he's foreclosing rival origins of legitimacy.
The intent is polemical in a distinctly 19th-century Protestant key. Hodge, a Princeton theologian steeped in Reformed confessionalism, is defending a high view of "office" without conceding to either Roman Catholic sacramental hierarchy or the American Protestant tendency toward voluntarism and charismatic free-for-all. In an era of revivals, populist religion, and denominational fragmentation, "who gets to speak for God?" isn't an abstract question. It's an institutional emergency.
The subtext is a rebuke to two threats at once: congregations that treat ministers as hired religious professionals, and self-appointed leaders who claim authority by sheer fervor. Hodge insists that Christ doesn't just authorize the job description; Christ supplies the person, the competencies, and the warrant. "Qualifications" matters here: it's a Protestant way of grounding authority in recognizable marks (doctrine, character, calling) rather than raw personality or mere electoral procedure.
What makes the line work is its controlled escalation. It begins with structure (officers exist), moves to function (duties and prerogatives), then tightens to ontology (the qualifications are given), and ends with legitimacy (the call itself confers authority). It's a theology designed to stabilize a church in modernity by anchoring leadership upstream, beyond the reach of popular mood.
The intent is polemical in a distinctly 19th-century Protestant key. Hodge, a Princeton theologian steeped in Reformed confessionalism, is defending a high view of "office" without conceding to either Roman Catholic sacramental hierarchy or the American Protestant tendency toward voluntarism and charismatic free-for-all. In an era of revivals, populist religion, and denominational fragmentation, "who gets to speak for God?" isn't an abstract question. It's an institutional emergency.
The subtext is a rebuke to two threats at once: congregations that treat ministers as hired religious professionals, and self-appointed leaders who claim authority by sheer fervor. Hodge insists that Christ doesn't just authorize the job description; Christ supplies the person, the competencies, and the warrant. "Qualifications" matters here: it's a Protestant way of grounding authority in recognizable marks (doctrine, character, calling) rather than raw personality or mere electoral procedure.
What makes the line work is its controlled escalation. It begins with structure (officers exist), moves to function (duties and prerogatives), then tightens to ontology (the qualifications are given), and ends with legitimacy (the call itself confers authority). It's a theology designed to stabilize a church in modernity by anchoring leadership upstream, beyond the reach of popular mood.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List


