"Cinema is still a very young art form with extraordinary techniques and very impressive special effects but sometimes it seems the soul has been taken out of things"
About this Quote
Deneuve’s complaint lands like a velvet slap: cinema has learned new tricks, and in mastering them it may have forgotten why anyone cared in the first place. She acknowledges the dazzle of contemporary filmmaking - “extraordinary techniques,” “impressive special effects” - but the praise is deliberately generic, almost like reading off a brochure. That’s the point. Technical prowess, in her framing, has become the default setting, no longer a marker of ambition but a baseline expectation.
The real charge is in “sometimes it seems the soul has been taken out of things.” Not “lost,” but “taken out” - a phrasing that implies intention, extraction, a system at work. She’s not nostalgic for grainy cameras; she’s skeptical of an industry that optimizes stories the way it optimizes workflows: smoothing edges, sanding down ambiguity, treating emotion as a deliverable rather than a risk.
Coming from Deneuve, the subtext carries the authority of a career built on directors who trusted stillness, suggestion, and adult contradiction. Her era prized the face as a landscape and silence as dialogue. In today’s attention economy, where spectacle can function as both marketing and anesthesia, “soul” becomes shorthand for what can’t be pre-visualized: moral complexity, erotic tension, the peculiar dread of real life, the sense that a scene might fail unless everyone is fully alive inside it.
It’s also a warning about power. When cinema’s most bankable language is effects, the people who control effects - studios, franchises, algorithms of audience testing - start controlling meaning. Deneuve’s line is less anti-technology than pro-human: an insistence that the camera should still chase something messier than perfection.
The real charge is in “sometimes it seems the soul has been taken out of things.” Not “lost,” but “taken out” - a phrasing that implies intention, extraction, a system at work. She’s not nostalgic for grainy cameras; she’s skeptical of an industry that optimizes stories the way it optimizes workflows: smoothing edges, sanding down ambiguity, treating emotion as a deliverable rather than a risk.
Coming from Deneuve, the subtext carries the authority of a career built on directors who trusted stillness, suggestion, and adult contradiction. Her era prized the face as a landscape and silence as dialogue. In today’s attention economy, where spectacle can function as both marketing and anesthesia, “soul” becomes shorthand for what can’t be pre-visualized: moral complexity, erotic tension, the peculiar dread of real life, the sense that a scene might fail unless everyone is fully alive inside it.
It’s also a warning about power. When cinema’s most bankable language is effects, the people who control effects - studios, franchises, algorithms of audience testing - start controlling meaning. Deneuve’s line is less anti-technology than pro-human: an insistence that the camera should still chase something messier than perfection.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Catherine
Add to List

