"Civilized countries generally adopt gold or silver or both as money"
About this Quote
Marshall slips a whole worldview into the apparently bland word “civilized.” The line isn’t just describing monetary practice; it’s grading societies. In late-19th-century political economy, to be “civilized” meant legible to finance, governable through rules, and trustworthy to international creditors. Gold and silver aren’t presented as one possible technology among many but as the monetary uniform of modernity: if you want entry into the club of “serious” nations, you speak the language of specie.
The specific intent is quietly prescriptive. Marshall is writing in an era when Britain’s gold standard sat at the center of global trade and empire, and when economists were trying to naturalize that architecture as common sense. By casting metal money as what “generally” happens, he frames the gold/silver standard as a default outcome of progress rather than a contested policy choice. That rhetorical move matters: it drains politics from the question. Debates over bimetallism, the deflationary squeeze of gold, and who bears the pain (debtors, farmers, workers) get blurred into a story of institutional maturation.
The subtext is confidence, and a warning. Confidence, because specie symbolizes restraint: governments can’t easily inflate; contracts travel across borders; “sound” money supposedly disciplines the state. Warning, because those who don’t adopt gold or silver are implied to be unstable, improvised, maybe even morally suspect. Marshall’s sentence performs what economics often does at its most influential: it turns a historically specific power arrangement into a benchmark for normalcy, then lets “normal” do the coercive work.
The specific intent is quietly prescriptive. Marshall is writing in an era when Britain’s gold standard sat at the center of global trade and empire, and when economists were trying to naturalize that architecture as common sense. By casting metal money as what “generally” happens, he frames the gold/silver standard as a default outcome of progress rather than a contested policy choice. That rhetorical move matters: it drains politics from the question. Debates over bimetallism, the deflationary squeeze of gold, and who bears the pain (debtors, farmers, workers) get blurred into a story of institutional maturation.
The subtext is confidence, and a warning. Confidence, because specie symbolizes restraint: governments can’t easily inflate; contracts travel across borders; “sound” money supposedly disciplines the state. Warning, because those who don’t adopt gold or silver are implied to be unstable, improvised, maybe even morally suspect. Marshall’s sentence performs what economics often does at its most influential: it turns a historically specific power arrangement into a benchmark for normalcy, then lets “normal” do the coercive work.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Alfred
Add to List





