"Climate change is also clearly a matter of huge interest and concern for the scientific community"
About this Quote
Peter Garrett’s line lands less like a lecture and more like a translation job: taking a sprawling, politicized crisis and recasting it in the sober register of professional credibility. As a musician-turned-public figure, he’s not pretending to be a climatologist; he’s pointing at the people who are. The move is strategic. “Clearly” signals impatience with manufactured doubt, a verbal eye-roll aimed at the culture-war habit of treating basic evidence like a partisan preference. And “also” matters: it implies climate change isn’t only an activist rallying cry or a moral cause, but an issue that has already set off alarm bells in the rooms where data, not vibes, decides what’s real.
The phrase “huge interest and concern” does double duty. “Interest” keeps the door open for the skeptical listener who bristles at apocalyptic rhetoric; it sounds like curiosity, inquiry, the normal work of science. “Concern” then tightens the screw, implying the findings are unsettling enough to demand attention. He’s threading the needle between accessibility and urgency without resorting to doomsday language that critics can caricature.
Contextually, Garrett comes from a strain of public life where celebrity is leveraged as a megaphone, not as expertise. The subtext is an appeal to institutional trust at a moment when that trust is fraying: if you won’t listen to politicians or performers, listen to the scientific community whose stake in the argument isn’t ideology but accuracy. It’s persuasion by delegation, and it works because it admits what it is.
The phrase “huge interest and concern” does double duty. “Interest” keeps the door open for the skeptical listener who bristles at apocalyptic rhetoric; it sounds like curiosity, inquiry, the normal work of science. “Concern” then tightens the screw, implying the findings are unsettling enough to demand attention. He’s threading the needle between accessibility and urgency without resorting to doomsday language that critics can caricature.
Contextually, Garrett comes from a strain of public life where celebrity is leveraged as a megaphone, not as expertise. The subtext is an appeal to institutional trust at a moment when that trust is fraying: if you won’t listen to politicians or performers, listen to the scientific community whose stake in the argument isn’t ideology but accuracy. It’s persuasion by delegation, and it works because it admits what it is.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List


