"Confidence-building is not something that can go on forever. If it goes on forever then it becomes counterproductive"
About this Quote
Confidence is supposed to be scaffolding, not the finished building. Aung San Suu Kyi’s line lands like a rebuke to the endless “process” politics that flourish under authoritarian pressure: the committees, the dialogues, the staged handshakes that create the appearance of progress while postponing the moment when power actually shifts.
The intent is tactical and moral at once. As an activist negotiating with entrenched regimes, she’s pointing to a familiar trap: confidence-building measures (CBMs) are useful precisely because they’re limited. They lower the temperature, establish basic trust, and make room for substantive steps. But when the ritual becomes the main event, it stops being a bridge and turns into a cul-de-sac. The subtext is blunt: if your opponent keeps asking for more patience, more “goodwill,” more incremental trust, they may be managing you, not meeting you.
What makes the phrasing work is its refusal of romantic faith in dialogue for dialogue’s sake. “Forever” is doing heavy lifting: it mocks the idea that time alone produces justice, or that trust is a substitute for accountability. The warning about becoming “counterproductive” signals that prolonged confidence-building doesn’t just stall outcomes; it can actively weaken a movement by draining urgency, normalizing bad-faith partners, and conditioning the public to expect symbolic concessions instead of structural change.
Contextually, the remark fits the late-20th-century democratization playbook in places like Myanmar, where regimes learned to weaponize negotiation itself. It’s a reminder that measured optimism has an expiration date: confidence is a tool, and tools become props when they’re never allowed to do the job.
The intent is tactical and moral at once. As an activist negotiating with entrenched regimes, she’s pointing to a familiar trap: confidence-building measures (CBMs) are useful precisely because they’re limited. They lower the temperature, establish basic trust, and make room for substantive steps. But when the ritual becomes the main event, it stops being a bridge and turns into a cul-de-sac. The subtext is blunt: if your opponent keeps asking for more patience, more “goodwill,” more incremental trust, they may be managing you, not meeting you.
What makes the phrasing work is its refusal of romantic faith in dialogue for dialogue’s sake. “Forever” is doing heavy lifting: it mocks the idea that time alone produces justice, or that trust is a substitute for accountability. The warning about becoming “counterproductive” signals that prolonged confidence-building doesn’t just stall outcomes; it can actively weaken a movement by draining urgency, normalizing bad-faith partners, and conditioning the public to expect symbolic concessions instead of structural change.
Contextually, the remark fits the late-20th-century democratization playbook in places like Myanmar, where regimes learned to weaponize negotiation itself. It’s a reminder that measured optimism has an expiration date: confidence is a tool, and tools become props when they’re never allowed to do the job.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Daw
Add to List






