"Conquest is not in our principles. It is inconsistent with our government"
About this Quote
Conquest is framed here as more than a bad habit of empires; its treated as a constitutional contradiction. Jeffersons line works because it yokes foreign policy to political identity: if the United States conquers, it doesnt just take land, it becomes the kind of state its founders claimed to be escaping. The sentence is spare, almost legalistic, and that austerity is strategic. It reads like a boundary clause, a warning that aggression abroad will metastasize into coercion at home.
The intent is partly diplomatic and partly self-mythmaking. Jefferson is speaking from a young republic eager to distinguish itself from European powers whose prestige was built on territorial appetite. By insisting conquest is inconsistent with our government, he casts restraint as principle rather than weakness, turning the absence of imperial machinery into a moral advantage. Its also a preemptive defense against domestic critics who feared standing armies, debt-financed wars, and executive overreach; conquest requires all three.
The subtext, though, is the American irony: Jefferson could denounce conquest while presiding over continental expansion and benefiting from a system that expanded through dispossession. The quote performs a kind of civic ventriloquism, describing an ideal republic even as the nations actual growth would test, and often violate, that ideal. Its power comes from that tension. Jefferson isnt just drawing a line in the sand; hes naming the cost of crossing it: not hypocrisy as a PR problem, but a transformation of the republics character.
The intent is partly diplomatic and partly self-mythmaking. Jefferson is speaking from a young republic eager to distinguish itself from European powers whose prestige was built on territorial appetite. By insisting conquest is inconsistent with our government, he casts restraint as principle rather than weakness, turning the absence of imperial machinery into a moral advantage. Its also a preemptive defense against domestic critics who feared standing armies, debt-financed wars, and executive overreach; conquest requires all three.
The subtext, though, is the American irony: Jefferson could denounce conquest while presiding over continental expansion and benefiting from a system that expanded through dispossession. The quote performs a kind of civic ventriloquism, describing an ideal republic even as the nations actual growth would test, and often violate, that ideal. Its power comes from that tension. Jefferson isnt just drawing a line in the sand; hes naming the cost of crossing it: not hypocrisy as a PR problem, but a transformation of the republics character.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List



