"Conservatism discards Prescription, shrinks from Principle, disavows Progress; having rejected all respect for antiquity, it offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future"
About this Quote
Disraeli loads this sentence like a parliamentary broadside: three clipped verbs, three capitalized abstractions, then a verdict. The music matters. "Discards", "shrinks", "disavows" move from active betrayal to moral cowardice to ideological denial. By the time he lands on "offers no redress... makes no preparation", conservatism isn’t merely wrong; it’s inert, a politics of evasion.
The subtext is tactical, not academic. Disraeli is policing the brand of conservatism in mid-19th-century Britain, when the old Tory identity had been scorched by the Reform Act of 1832 and the shockwaves of industrialization. After Peel’s repeal of the Corn Laws split the party, "conservative" risked becoming a label for whatever was left: reflexive obstruction dressed up as tradition. Disraeli’s jab is that this counterfeit conservatism doesn’t even conserve. It dumps "Prescription" (the legitimacy of inherited institutions), panics at "Principle" (a coherent philosophy), and renounces "Progress" (any plan for modern conditions). That triad implies a political party hollowing itself out to survive the news cycle of its day: all posture, no doctrine.
There’s a neat inversion at the center: "having rejected all respect for antiquity" flips the usual liberal accusation on its head. He’s saying the real vandal of the past is the conservative who treats tradition as a prop, not a duty. Contextually, it’s also self-justification for Disraeli’s "one-nation" pitch: reform as conservation, progress as social insurance against upheaval. If you won’t anchor the present in the past or build toward the future, you’re not conserving anything; you’re just refusing responsibility.
The subtext is tactical, not academic. Disraeli is policing the brand of conservatism in mid-19th-century Britain, when the old Tory identity had been scorched by the Reform Act of 1832 and the shockwaves of industrialization. After Peel’s repeal of the Corn Laws split the party, "conservative" risked becoming a label for whatever was left: reflexive obstruction dressed up as tradition. Disraeli’s jab is that this counterfeit conservatism doesn’t even conserve. It dumps "Prescription" (the legitimacy of inherited institutions), panics at "Principle" (a coherent philosophy), and renounces "Progress" (any plan for modern conditions). That triad implies a political party hollowing itself out to survive the news cycle of its day: all posture, no doctrine.
There’s a neat inversion at the center: "having rejected all respect for antiquity" flips the usual liberal accusation on its head. He’s saying the real vandal of the past is the conservative who treats tradition as a prop, not a duty. Contextually, it’s also self-justification for Disraeli’s "one-nation" pitch: reform as conservation, progress as social insurance against upheaval. If you won’t anchor the present in the past or build toward the future, you’re not conserving anything; you’re just refusing responsibility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Benjamin
Add to List





