"Conservatives, despite their increasingly powerful presence on cable TV and talk radio, feel excluded and disregarded by the longstanding preponderance of liberal voices on public television"
About this Quote
Medved’s line performs a neat inversion: it frames conservatives as both dominant and dispossessed, culturally loud yet institutionally unheard. The opening concession - “increasingly powerful presence on cable TV and talk radio” - reads like a dutiful nod to observable reality, only to pivot into the real argument: power isn’t the same as legitimacy. Cable and talk radio are coded here as populist, rough-edged platforms; “public television” carries the aura of civic endorsement, educational prestige, and tasteful authority. The complaint isn’t just about airtime. It’s about who gets to sound like the nation’s responsible adult.
“Feel excluded and disregarded” is doing crucial work. It’s subjective language that preempts fact-checking and invites identification. You can’t easily argue someone out of a feeling, and that’s the point: grievance becomes the evidence. Medved also sneaks in “longstanding preponderance,” a phrase that implies a structural, historical imbalance - not a temporary media cycle, but a cultural regime. The subtext is that liberal dominance isn’t merely a market phenomenon; it’s an establishment default embedded in public institutions.
Context matters: this is a late-20th/early-21st-century conservative media critique, emerging as right-leaning outlets expanded dramatically yet still positioned themselves as outsiders battling elite gatekeepers. Medved’s intent is strategic: to turn cultural prestige into a contested resource, arguing that even when conservatives win the ratings war, they’re still losing the “who counts as mainstream” war.
“Feel excluded and disregarded” is doing crucial work. It’s subjective language that preempts fact-checking and invites identification. You can’t easily argue someone out of a feeling, and that’s the point: grievance becomes the evidence. Medved also sneaks in “longstanding preponderance,” a phrase that implies a structural, historical imbalance - not a temporary media cycle, but a cultural regime. The subtext is that liberal dominance isn’t merely a market phenomenon; it’s an establishment default embedded in public institutions.
Context matters: this is a late-20th/early-21st-century conservative media critique, emerging as right-leaning outlets expanded dramatically yet still positioned themselves as outsiders battling elite gatekeepers. Medved’s intent is strategic: to turn cultural prestige into a contested resource, arguing that even when conservatives win the ratings war, they’re still losing the “who counts as mainstream” war.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
