"Constitutions should consist only of general provisions; the reason is that they must necessarily be permanent, and that they cannot calculate for the possible change of things"
About this Quote
Hamilton is making a case for restraint dressed up as foresight: a constitution should be a skeleton, not a script. The line carries the hard-earned paranoia of a founding era that had watched governments collapse under the weight of their own certainties. If you try to legislate the future in detail, he argues, you don’t get stability; you get fragility. The more precise the blueprint, the easier it is for time to crack it.
The specific intent is strategic. Hamilton wants a durable national framework that can survive demographic growth, economic transformation, and geopolitical shocks without requiring constant refounding. General provisions preserve legitimacy by allowing ordinary politics to do the adapting through statutes, institutions, and interpretation. This isn’t abstract reverence for “principles”; it’s a design choice meant to protect the state from becoming hostage to yesterday’s anxieties.
The subtext is also a quiet power move. A constitution built on broad language inevitably creates room for discretion: for courts to interpret, for executives to act in emergencies, for legislators to fill in the blanks. Hamilton, famously comfortable with energetic federal authority, is advocating flexibility that can expand national capacity as circumstances demand. “Cannot calculate” sounds humble, but it’s also permission-granting: when the world changes, the framework must be able to stretch rather than snap.
Context matters: this is the post-Revolution argument against the chaos of weak confederation and the temptation to overcorrect with micromanagement. Hamilton’s brilliance is turning uncertainty into a governing principle, making adaptability itself a cornerstone of permanence.
The specific intent is strategic. Hamilton wants a durable national framework that can survive demographic growth, economic transformation, and geopolitical shocks without requiring constant refounding. General provisions preserve legitimacy by allowing ordinary politics to do the adapting through statutes, institutions, and interpretation. This isn’t abstract reverence for “principles”; it’s a design choice meant to protect the state from becoming hostage to yesterday’s anxieties.
The subtext is also a quiet power move. A constitution built on broad language inevitably creates room for discretion: for courts to interpret, for executives to act in emergencies, for legislators to fill in the blanks. Hamilton, famously comfortable with energetic federal authority, is advocating flexibility that can expand national capacity as circumstances demand. “Cannot calculate” sounds humble, but it’s also permission-granting: when the world changes, the framework must be able to stretch rather than snap.
Context matters: this is the post-Revolution argument against the chaos of weak confederation and the temptation to overcorrect with micromanagement. Hamilton’s brilliance is turning uncertainty into a governing principle, making adaptability itself a cornerstone of permanence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alexander
Add to List




