"Copy nature and you infringe on the work of our Lord. Interpret nature and you are an artist"
About this Quote
There’s a proud, almost courtroom audacity in Lipchitz calling realism a kind of spiritual copyright violation. The jab isn’t really at craft; it’s at obedience. “Copy nature” names the academic tradition that trained artists to become high-end duplicators, polishing their skill until the world looks convincingly reissued. By framing that as infringement “on the work of our Lord,” Lipchitz borrows religious authority to make a modernist point: if the goal is perfect likeness, the artist is competing with creation itself, and losing on principle.
What rescues the maker from that futile rivalry is the verb switch. “Interpret” implies selection, distortion, emphasis, translation. It grants the artist agency to decide what nature means rather than merely what it looks like. That’s the subtext: art isn’t a mirror; it’s an argument. Lipchitz, a Cubist sculptor, is defending a practice that breaks bodies into planes, reorders perspective, and treats form as thinking. In early 20th-century sculpture, that move wasn’t decorative rebellion; it was a philosophical claim that the world isn’t experienced as a static outline but as a layered, partial, pressured encounter.
The quote also slips in a moral hierarchy. Copying is positioned as derivative, even presumptuous; interpreting becomes a humble kind of originality, acknowledging nature as source while insisting that human perception is the real medium. Lipchitz is staking out modernism’s core ethic: fidelity to sensation, not to surfaces.
What rescues the maker from that futile rivalry is the verb switch. “Interpret” implies selection, distortion, emphasis, translation. It grants the artist agency to decide what nature means rather than merely what it looks like. That’s the subtext: art isn’t a mirror; it’s an argument. Lipchitz, a Cubist sculptor, is defending a practice that breaks bodies into planes, reorders perspective, and treats form as thinking. In early 20th-century sculpture, that move wasn’t decorative rebellion; it was a philosophical claim that the world isn’t experienced as a static outline but as a layered, partial, pressured encounter.
The quote also slips in a moral hierarchy. Copying is positioned as derivative, even presumptuous; interpreting becomes a humble kind of originality, acknowledging nature as source while insisting that human perception is the real medium. Lipchitz is staking out modernism’s core ethic: fidelity to sensation, not to surfaces.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List








