"Could a man live by it, it were not unpleasant employment to be a poet"
About this Quote
The phrase "not unpleasant employment" is a masterclass in measured understatement. Goldsmith refuses the romantic pose of the inspired seer; he frames writing as labor that happens to be agreeable. The modesty is strategic. In an 18th-century culture suspicious of idle men and dependent on patronage, presenting poetry as pleasant work rather than aristocratic dalliance is a bid for legitimacy. He’s selling respectability to an audience that might otherwise dismiss poets as freeloaders with quills.
Context matters: Goldsmith lived the problem. He drifted through debts and precarious gigs, writing for periodicals and the stage, always negotiating between art and the market. The sentence reads like a sigh from inside the early modern attention economy, when authorship was becoming professional but hadn’t yet become reliably payable. Its sting is that the obstacle isn’t inspiration; it’s the invoice. Poetry would be a fine job, he implies, if it were allowed to be one.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Goldsmith, Oliver. (2026, January 18). Could a man live by it, it were not unpleasant employment to be a poet. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/could-a-man-live-by-it-it-were-not-unpleasant-11096/
Chicago Style
Goldsmith, Oliver. "Could a man live by it, it were not unpleasant employment to be a poet." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/could-a-man-live-by-it-it-were-not-unpleasant-11096/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Could a man live by it, it were not unpleasant employment to be a poet." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/could-a-man-live-by-it-it-were-not-unpleasant-11096/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.












