"Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal, if you don't use your "
About this Quote
Lehrer’s intent is classic: take a nerdy concept (number bases) and expose the flimsy cultural scaffolding underneath what we treat as common sense. The subtext is a gentle insult to human certainty. We act like the decimal system is the default setting of reality, when it’s really a biological coincidence. In octal, you’d be fine - provided you’re willing to stop leaning on your body as a calculator. The missing word is the punchline and the thesis at once: our most basic tools of reasoning are often prosthetics.
Context matters because Lehrer wasn’t just a songwriter; he was a mathematically trained satirist who loved puncturing institutional seriousness with tidy, singable logic. This line lands like a one-liner, but it’s also a miniature critique of “naturalness” as an argument. The joke flatters the audience’s intelligence while reminding them that intelligence is often just habit with good marketing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Puns & Wordplay |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Lehrer, Tom. (2026, January 16). Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal, if you don't use your . FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/counting-in-octal-is-just-like-counting-in-121928/
Chicago Style
Lehrer, Tom. "Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal, if you don't use your ." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/counting-in-octal-is-just-like-counting-in-121928/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Counting in octal is just like counting in decimal, if you don't use your ." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/counting-in-octal-is-just-like-counting-in-121928/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







