"Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training"
About this Quote
“Bad training” lands like a polite understatement, the kind that lets a psychologist indict an entire culture of pedagogy without sounding like a pamphleteer. Anna Freud is talking about education, yes, but also about the broader machinery that tries to standardize young people into something legible: compliant students, predictable workers, emotionally managed adults. The line’s bite is in its asymmetry. Training can be “any kind of bad,” expansive and relentless; survival, by contrast, is narrow and hard-won. She’s not promising that creative minds will flourish. She’s saying they can endure.
The subtext is psychoanalytic: creativity isn’t just a talent, it’s a psychological maneuver. Children invent, imagine, and play partly as pleasure, partly as defense. When instruction becomes coercive or shaming, the creative child doesn’t simply “learn anyway”; they improvise around the damage, turning constraint into material. That’s what “known to survive” implies: an observational claim, almost clinical, drawn from watching how minds protect their autonomy.
Context matters. Freud worked amid the upheavals of early- to mid-20th century Europe and helped build child analysis as a field; she saw how institutions - schools, families, states - press themselves into the psyche. Against that, the quote offers a wary kind of faith: creativity as resilience, not virtue. It also carries an implicit warning to educators and parents. If the best you can do is “bad training,” don’t take the eventual success of a creative person as evidence the system worked. It may just mean the person did.
The subtext is psychoanalytic: creativity isn’t just a talent, it’s a psychological maneuver. Children invent, imagine, and play partly as pleasure, partly as defense. When instruction becomes coercive or shaming, the creative child doesn’t simply “learn anyway”; they improvise around the damage, turning constraint into material. That’s what “known to survive” implies: an observational claim, almost clinical, drawn from watching how minds protect their autonomy.
Context matters. Freud worked amid the upheavals of early- to mid-20th century Europe and helped build child analysis as a field; she saw how institutions - schools, families, states - press themselves into the psyche. Against that, the quote offers a wary kind of faith: creativity as resilience, not virtue. It also carries an implicit warning to educators and parents. If the best you can do is “bad training,” don’t take the eventual success of a creative person as evidence the system worked. It may just mean the person did.
Quote Details
| Topic | Resilience |
|---|
More Quotes by Anna
Add to List









