"Creativity shouldn't be following radio; it should be the other way around"
About this Quote
Hancock flips the relationship. The point is not that radio is evil, but that culture stagnates when distribution becomes the author. His career makes the argument credible: he moved from acoustic jazz to funk, electronics, and hip-hop collaborations, often arriving early enough that gatekeepers had to catch up. Thats the implied model here: real innovation makes institutions recalibrate, not artists self-edit to fit yesterday's programming grid.
The subtext is a warning to younger musicians and a rebuke to executives: if you treat "radio-friendly" as a synonym for good, you train talent to fear risk and mistake familiarity for connection. Hancock is defending a longer timeline of value, where the weird idea survives long enough to become the new common sense. In a world where algorithms have replaced DJs, the quote lands even harder: creativity should lead the data, not be disciplined by it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Hancock, Herbie. (n.d.). Creativity shouldn't be following radio; it should be the other way around. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/creativity-shouldnt-be-following-radio-it-should-88969/
Chicago Style
Hancock, Herbie. "Creativity shouldn't be following radio; it should be the other way around." FixQuotes. Accessed February 3, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/creativity-shouldnt-be-following-radio-it-should-88969/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Creativity shouldn't be following radio; it should be the other way around." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/creativity-shouldnt-be-following-radio-it-should-88969/. Accessed 3 Feb. 2026.
