"Currently, most States do not recognize within their borders concealed carry permits issued in other States"
About this Quote
A bureaucratic sentence that quietly stages a constitutional showdown. Howard Coble’s line sounds like a neutral status report, but it’s doing the oldest trick in legislative messaging: describing a policy landscape in a way that makes federal intervention feel like housekeeping rather than ideology. “Currently” signals contingency, a problem awaiting correction. “Most States” implies a stubborn majority out of step with some implied norm. “Within their borders” foregrounds territorial sovereignty, only to set up the grievance that sovereignty is being used “not [to] recognize” something framed as already legitimate elsewhere.
The subtext is reciprocity as a fairness argument: if your driver’s license travels, why can’t your concealed carry permit? That comparison is rhetorically useful because it shifts the debate from guns to administrative consistency. It also smuggles in a larger claim about rights: not merely that carrying is legal in some places, but that recognition should be portable, bordering on a national entitlement. The phrase “issued in other States” makes the permits sound official, vetted, and interchangeable, flattening the fact that states have radically different training requirements, background checks, and standards for revocation.
Context matters: Coble, a longtime Republican congressman from North Carolina, spent years backing national concealed-carry reciprocity proposals. This sentence belongs to that effort, positioned against a patchwork of state laws that can turn a legal carrier into a felon at a state line. It’s an appeal to predictability for gun owners, and a challenge to states’ rights dressed up as a complaint about states exercising them.
The subtext is reciprocity as a fairness argument: if your driver’s license travels, why can’t your concealed carry permit? That comparison is rhetorically useful because it shifts the debate from guns to administrative consistency. It also smuggles in a larger claim about rights: not merely that carrying is legal in some places, but that recognition should be portable, bordering on a national entitlement. The phrase “issued in other States” makes the permits sound official, vetted, and interchangeable, flattening the fact that states have radically different training requirements, background checks, and standards for revocation.
Context matters: Coble, a longtime Republican congressman from North Carolina, spent years backing national concealed-carry reciprocity proposals. This sentence belongs to that effort, positioned against a patchwork of state laws that can turn a legal carrier into a felon at a state line. It’s an appeal to predictability for gun owners, and a challenge to states’ rights dressed up as a complaint about states exercising them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List







