"Dams have harmed our wildlife and made rivers less useful for recreation"
About this Quote
Ambrose’s sentence lands like a field note disguised as common sense: dams don’t just “change” rivers, they injure them, and the injuries show up where Americans actually notice - in the animals that disappear and the weekends that get worse. The phrasing is deliberately practical. He doesn’t lead with hydrology or policy; he leads with consequences that fit on a bumper sticker and still point to a complicated system of tradeoffs.
The intent is to reframe dams from triumphal infrastructure to moral and civic liability. For most of the 20th century, dams were monuments to national competence: electrify, irrigate, control floods, fuel growth. Ambrose, a historian of American ambition, is tugging at that mythology. “Harmed our wildlife” invokes the public’s widening ecological conscience after mid-century environmentalism: salmon runs cut off, wetlands altered, river temperatures and sediment flows disrupted. “Made rivers less useful for recreation” is an even sharper move, because it translates ecology into everyday loss - the river as public commons. It’s an argument that bypasses partisan abstraction: you can debate kilowatts; it’s harder to shrug at a dead fishery or a river that no longer feels like a river.
The subtext is an indictment of a particular American habit: treating nature as a machine to optimize, then acting surprised when the machine stops behaving like a living place. Ambrose isn’t anti-technology so much as anti-amnesia. He’s reminding readers that progress has a receipt, and the bill comes due in silence where there used to be birds and in flat water where there used to be current.
The intent is to reframe dams from triumphal infrastructure to moral and civic liability. For most of the 20th century, dams were monuments to national competence: electrify, irrigate, control floods, fuel growth. Ambrose, a historian of American ambition, is tugging at that mythology. “Harmed our wildlife” invokes the public’s widening ecological conscience after mid-century environmentalism: salmon runs cut off, wetlands altered, river temperatures and sediment flows disrupted. “Made rivers less useful for recreation” is an even sharper move, because it translates ecology into everyday loss - the river as public commons. It’s an argument that bypasses partisan abstraction: you can debate kilowatts; it’s harder to shrug at a dead fishery or a river that no longer feels like a river.
The subtext is an indictment of a particular American habit: treating nature as a machine to optimize, then acting surprised when the machine stops behaving like a living place. Ambrose isn’t anti-technology so much as anti-amnesia. He’s reminding readers that progress has a receipt, and the bill comes due in silence where there used to be birds and in flat water where there used to be current.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List

