"DeLillo never seems committed to me to what he is writing. Very nice surfaces, but he's got nothing underneath"
About this Quote
The line works because it weaponizes a familiar aesthetic suspicion: style as alibi. "Committed" is doing heavy lifting here, echoing midcentury expectations that literature should stand for something legible - political commitment, humanist depth, existential authenticity. Fiedler's "nothing underneath" implies a hidden fraud, as if DeLillo's prose were a glossy product lacking inner substance. It's also a misrecognition of DeLillo's method, where the "underneath" is not private soul but systems: the way crowds, broadcasts, and catastrophes overwrite interior life.
Context matters: Fiedler came up in an era when critics built reputations by sorting the profound from the fashionable. By the time DeLillo's cool, high-design fiction became a shorthand for "postmodern", calling him uncommitted doubles as a warning about a broader cultural drift - toward spectacle, irony, and the fear that everyone is performing rather than believing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Fiedler, Leslie. (2026, January 15). DeLillo never seems committed to me to what he is writing. Very nice surfaces, but he's got nothing underneath. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/delillo-never-seems-committed-to-me-to-what-he-is-148918/
Chicago Style
Fiedler, Leslie. "DeLillo never seems committed to me to what he is writing. Very nice surfaces, but he's got nothing underneath." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/delillo-never-seems-committed-to-me-to-what-he-is-148918/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"DeLillo never seems committed to me to what he is writing. Very nice surfaces, but he's got nothing underneath." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/delillo-never-seems-committed-to-me-to-what-he-is-148918/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





