"Demands for equality for women are threats to men's self-esteem and sense of sexual turf"
About this Quote
Equality, Rossi suggests, doesn’t just redistribute power; it punctures a story men have been trained to live inside. The phrasing is clinically unsentimental: “demands” casts women’s claims as organized pressure rather than polite petition, while “threats” names the predictable backlash without romanticizing it as misunderstanding. She isn’t flattering anyone’s motives. She’s diagnosing the emotional mechanics of patriarchy at the exact point where it pretends to be rational.
The key move is “self-esteem” paired with “sexual turf.” Rossi links public status to private entitlement, implying that gender hierarchy isn’t maintained only through laws and workplaces but through a possessive logic around bodies, attention, and access. “Turf” is deliberately animal and territorial; it frames masculinity as a boundary system. Women’s equality becomes, in this view, not an abstract moral problem but a perceived invasion: if women are equals, then what, exactly, is being “guarded” in dating, marriage, or the office flirt economy? Rossi’s subtext is that male identity has been built to require asymmetry. Take the asymmetry away and you don’t just change the rules; you expose how much of the game was psychological compensation.
Context matters: writing out of mid-20th-century American sociology and second-wave feminism, Rossi is tracking how institutions change slower than gendered self-concepts. Her point still lands because resistance to equality often disguises itself as concern for “tradition,” “merit,” or “family stability.” Rossi strips that disguise off and leaves the raw nerve: wounded entitlement posing as principle.
The key move is “self-esteem” paired with “sexual turf.” Rossi links public status to private entitlement, implying that gender hierarchy isn’t maintained only through laws and workplaces but through a possessive logic around bodies, attention, and access. “Turf” is deliberately animal and territorial; it frames masculinity as a boundary system. Women’s equality becomes, in this view, not an abstract moral problem but a perceived invasion: if women are equals, then what, exactly, is being “guarded” in dating, marriage, or the office flirt economy? Rossi’s subtext is that male identity has been built to require asymmetry. Take the asymmetry away and you don’t just change the rules; you expose how much of the game was psychological compensation.
Context matters: writing out of mid-20th-century American sociology and second-wave feminism, Rossi is tracking how institutions change slower than gendered self-concepts. Her point still lands because resistance to equality often disguises itself as concern for “tradition,” “merit,” or “family stability.” Rossi strips that disguise off and leaves the raw nerve: wounded entitlement posing as principle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alice
Add to List


