"Democracy doesn't recognize east or west; democracy is simply people's will. Therefore, I do not acknowledge that there are various models of democracy; there is just democracy itself"
About this Quote
The line lands like a clean legal argument dressed up as moral clarity: if democracy is the people’s will, then geography can’t be used as an alibi. Shirin Ebadi is pushing back on a familiar dodge in authoritarian or semi-authoritarian states: the claim that Western-style democracy is culturally incompatible, destabilizing, or imported. By flattening the map - “doesn’t recognize east or west” - she denies rulers the rhetorical refuge of “our tradition” when what they often mean is “our control.”
The subtext is sharper than it looks. Ebadi isn’t only criticizing dictators; she’s also warning Western policymakers who treat rights as negotiable depending on the region. Her phrasing resists the patronizing taxonomy of “mature democracies,” “guided democracies,” “Asian values,” “Islamic democracy” - labels that can become a way to excuse repression while maintaining diplomatic comfort. In her framing, “various models” isn’t pluralism; it’s a loophole.
Context matters: Ebadi, an Iranian lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, speaks from a political landscape where elections exist but the boundaries of acceptable choice are tightly managed. Her insistence on a singular “democracy itself” reads as courtroom strategy: narrow the definition, remove the wiggle room, force a yes-or-no question. It’s a universalist move with teeth, aimed at regimes that want the legitimacy of the word “democracy” without the risk of letting people actually decide.
The subtext is sharper than it looks. Ebadi isn’t only criticizing dictators; she’s also warning Western policymakers who treat rights as negotiable depending on the region. Her phrasing resists the patronizing taxonomy of “mature democracies,” “guided democracies,” “Asian values,” “Islamic democracy” - labels that can become a way to excuse repression while maintaining diplomatic comfort. In her framing, “various models” isn’t pluralism; it’s a loophole.
Context matters: Ebadi, an Iranian lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, speaks from a political landscape where elections exist but the boundaries of acceptable choice are tightly managed. Her insistence on a singular “democracy itself” reads as courtroom strategy: narrow the definition, remove the wiggle room, force a yes-or-no question. It’s a universalist move with teeth, aimed at regimes that want the legitimacy of the word “democracy” without the risk of letting people actually decide.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Shirin
Add to List
