"Democracy is a process by which people are free to choose the man who will get the blame"
About this Quote
Democracy, in Peter's telling, isn't the triumph of popular wisdom; it's the formalization of scapegoating. The line lands because it flips the civic myth. We like to frame elections as empowerment, a collective steering wheel. Peter reframes them as a liability transfer: the public doesn't just pick a leader, it picks a defendant.
The phrasing is doing careful work. "Process" drains romance from the system, making it sound like bureaucracy rather than destiny. "Free to choose" invokes the sacred language of rights, then undercuts it with "the man who will get the blame", a punchline that treats freedom as the freedom to outsource consequences. It's not anti-democratic so much as anti-sentimental: voters want agency without ownership, and politicians, in turn, build careers on absorbing (and redistributing) public anger.
Context matters here. Peter, best known for the Peter Principle, wrote with a managerial eye for how systems fail regardless of intentions. Mid-20th-century mass politics also professionalized blame: press secretaries, polling, message discipline, the rise of the "gaffe" as a governing event. In that environment, leadership becomes less about command than about being the designated shock absorber.
The subtext is grimly modern: democracy can become a ritual where the electorate expresses dissatisfaction on schedule, then returns to the comfort of believing someone else is responsible. Peter's wit is that he doesn't deny choice; he suggests we often use choice defensively, selecting not a visionary but a lightning rod.
The phrasing is doing careful work. "Process" drains romance from the system, making it sound like bureaucracy rather than destiny. "Free to choose" invokes the sacred language of rights, then undercuts it with "the man who will get the blame", a punchline that treats freedom as the freedom to outsource consequences. It's not anti-democratic so much as anti-sentimental: voters want agency without ownership, and politicians, in turn, build careers on absorbing (and redistributing) public anger.
Context matters here. Peter, best known for the Peter Principle, wrote with a managerial eye for how systems fail regardless of intentions. Mid-20th-century mass politics also professionalized blame: press secretaries, polling, message discipline, the rise of the "gaffe" as a governing event. In that environment, leadership becomes less about command than about being the designated shock absorber.
The subtext is grimly modern: democracy can become a ritual where the electorate expresses dissatisfaction on schedule, then returns to the comfort of believing someone else is responsible. Peter's wit is that he doesn't deny choice; he suggests we often use choice defensively, selecting not a visionary but a lightning rod.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Laurence
Add to List
