"Democracy is necessary to peace and to undermining the forces of terrorism"
About this Quote
Bhutto’s line is doing diplomatic work with a steel core: it reframes democracy not as a Western luxury, but as hard security infrastructure. Coming from a Pakistani prime minister who survived coups, exile, and assassination threats, “necessary” lands less like a slogan and more like a warning label. She’s arguing that the absence of legitimate political channels doesn’t just produce bad governance; it manufactures recruits, grievances, and conspiracies.
The sentence links “peace” and “undermining the forces of terrorism” as if they’re the same project, because in Bhutto’s experience they often are. Terrorism feeds on the voids created by authoritarianism: silenced opposition, corrupted courts, hollow parliaments, militarized policing. Democracy, in her framing, is not sentimental majoritarianism; it’s a set of pressure valves - accountability, participation, lawful dissent - that make violence less strategically attractive. The subtext is aimed at multiple audiences at once: Western capitals tempted to back “strongmen” for short-term stability, Pakistani power brokers who treated civilian rule as optional, and Islamists who claimed political monopoly through intimidation.
Context matters: post-9/11 counterterror policy often prioritized coercion over legitimacy, drones over institutions, intelligence alliances over rights. Bhutto is pushing back against that bargain. She implies a causal chain that many leaders avoid stating plainly: if you want less terror, you need more politics - not just elections, but credible governance that can absorb anger without producing martyrs. Her rhetorical choice is calibrated to make democracy sound like realism, not idealism.
The sentence links “peace” and “undermining the forces of terrorism” as if they’re the same project, because in Bhutto’s experience they often are. Terrorism feeds on the voids created by authoritarianism: silenced opposition, corrupted courts, hollow parliaments, militarized policing. Democracy, in her framing, is not sentimental majoritarianism; it’s a set of pressure valves - accountability, participation, lawful dissent - that make violence less strategically attractive. The subtext is aimed at multiple audiences at once: Western capitals tempted to back “strongmen” for short-term stability, Pakistani power brokers who treated civilian rule as optional, and Islamists who claimed political monopoly through intimidation.
Context matters: post-9/11 counterterror policy often prioritized coercion over legitimacy, drones over institutions, intelligence alliances over rights. Bhutto is pushing back against that bargain. She implies a causal chain that many leaders avoid stating plainly: if you want less terror, you need more politics - not just elections, but credible governance that can absorb anger without producing martyrs. Her rhetorical choice is calibrated to make democracy sound like realism, not idealism.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Benazir
Add to List







