"Despair and frustration will not shake our belief that the resistance is the only way of liberation"
About this Quote
“Despair and frustration” are named like enemies with passports: inevitable, present, but not entitled to govern. Emile Lahud’s line isn’t trying to inspire in the soft sense; it’s trying to discipline. The opening concedes emotional collapse as a rational response to conditions on the ground, then refuses to grant it political authority. That’s the intent: to keep a movement from mistaking exhaustion for analysis, to keep morale from becoming policy.
The phrase “will not shake our belief” signals that what’s at stake is not just a tactic but a creed. Lahud isn’t arguing that resistance is effective; he’s arguing that it’s necessary. “Belief” is doing heavy lifting here, turning strategy into identity. That’s the subtext: if resistance is “the only way,” then alternatives (negotiation, compromise, waiting, international mediation) aren’t merely impractical; they’re framed as forms of surrender or self-deception.
The construction also smuggles in a collective “we,” a statesman’s favorite rhetorical technology. It recruits the listener into a shared posture of defiance and implies consensus even where divisions may exist. This is how political language stabilizes a coalition: by making dissent feel like emotional weakness rather than legitimate disagreement.
Context matters: leaders reach for absolutes when legitimacy is contested and time is running. “Liberation” is the final, morally unassailable destination; “resistance” becomes the sanctified road to get there. The line works because it converts pain into proof - not that victory is near, but that the cause is real enough to demand endurance.
The phrase “will not shake our belief” signals that what’s at stake is not just a tactic but a creed. Lahud isn’t arguing that resistance is effective; he’s arguing that it’s necessary. “Belief” is doing heavy lifting here, turning strategy into identity. That’s the subtext: if resistance is “the only way,” then alternatives (negotiation, compromise, waiting, international mediation) aren’t merely impractical; they’re framed as forms of surrender or self-deception.
The construction also smuggles in a collective “we,” a statesman’s favorite rhetorical technology. It recruits the listener into a shared posture of defiance and implies consensus even where divisions may exist. This is how political language stabilizes a coalition: by making dissent feel like emotional weakness rather than legitimate disagreement.
Context matters: leaders reach for absolutes when legitimacy is contested and time is running. “Liberation” is the final, morally unassailable destination; “resistance” becomes the sanctified road to get there. The line works because it converts pain into proof - not that victory is near, but that the cause is real enough to demand endurance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Emile
Add to List






