"Distinctly American poetry is usually written in the context of one's geographic landscape, sometimes out of one's cultural myths, and often with reference to gender and race or ethnic origins"
About this Quote
American poetry, in Wakoski's framing, doesn’t float above the country; it keeps tripping over it. “Distinctly American” isn’t a flag pinned to the page so much as a set of pressures: the land underfoot, the stories we inherit, the bodies we’re allowed to speak from. Her sentence reads like a field guide to how American identity gets made in art - not by abstract ideals, but by situated voice.
The first move is geographic. Landscape here isn’t scenic wallpaper; it’s an engine of consciousness. The U.S. has always treated space as destiny (frontier, suburb, reservation, border), and poetry absorbs that logic. Place determines what’s visible, what’s survivable, what counts as home. Even when a poem never names a state, it can still carry the weather of a region: drought, sprawl, enclosure, distance.
Then come “cultural myths,” a phrase that politely points to a more brutal reality: America runs on self-narration. The myths are usable - they offer shared shorthand - but they also deform. To write “distinctly American” is often to negotiate with stories that promise innocence (exceptionalism, reinvention) while hiding theft, labor, and exclusion. Wakoski implies that poets don’t simply draw from myth; they interrogate it, revise it, or get burned by it.
Her final clause sharpens the argument: gender and race aren’t optional themes, they’re coordinates. In a nation built through stratified citizenship, voice is never neutral. The “often” is doing wry work, acknowledging both the inevitability of identity politics and the resistance to naming it. Wakoski’s intent is less to prescribe content than to expose the infrastructure: American poems are shaped by where you stand, what you’ve been told, and how you’ve been sorted.
The first move is geographic. Landscape here isn’t scenic wallpaper; it’s an engine of consciousness. The U.S. has always treated space as destiny (frontier, suburb, reservation, border), and poetry absorbs that logic. Place determines what’s visible, what’s survivable, what counts as home. Even when a poem never names a state, it can still carry the weather of a region: drought, sprawl, enclosure, distance.
Then come “cultural myths,” a phrase that politely points to a more brutal reality: America runs on self-narration. The myths are usable - they offer shared shorthand - but they also deform. To write “distinctly American” is often to negotiate with stories that promise innocence (exceptionalism, reinvention) while hiding theft, labor, and exclusion. Wakoski implies that poets don’t simply draw from myth; they interrogate it, revise it, or get burned by it.
Her final clause sharpens the argument: gender and race aren’t optional themes, they’re coordinates. In a nation built through stratified citizenship, voice is never neutral. The “often” is doing wry work, acknowledging both the inevitability of identity politics and the resistance to naming it. Wakoski’s intent is less to prescribe content than to expose the infrastructure: American poems are shaped by where you stand, what you’ve been told, and how you’ve been sorted.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Diane
Add to List
