"Do not bury our glorious orthodoxy in the treacherous pit of a spurious conservatism"
About this Quote
Kuyper’s line is a warning shot fired from inside the camp: the real threat isn’t “liberalism out there,” it’s a counterfeit conservatism that mistakes caution for faithfulness. The verbs do the heavy lifting. “Do not bury” turns doctrine into something alive, worth defending, and terribly easy to suffocate under pious inertia. “Glorious orthodoxy” isn’t a neutral label; it’s a rallying banner, designed to make tradition feel radiant rather than dusty. Then Kuyper drives the blade in: “treacherous pit” suggests not mere error but betrayal, a collapse that happens when you think you’re standing on safe ground.
The subtext is distinctly Kuyperian. As a Dutch Reformed theologian and political organizer, he lived in a world where “conservative” could mean protecting establishment comforts, class interests, or churchly respectability. Kuyper’s project (from church reform to pillarization and the founding of the Free University of Amsterdam) depended on conviction with public consequences: orthodoxy that builds institutions, challenges elites, and competes for cultural power. That kind of activism can look disruptive, even radical, compared to a conservatism that mainly wants quiet.
So he reframes the debate. Orthodoxy, in his telling, is not the same as conserving whatever currently exists. It can demand change, conflict, even risk. The insult “spurious” is strategic: it denies his opponents the prestige of the conservative label while claiming the true inheritance for his side. Kuyper isn’t pleading for moderation; he’s insisting that doctrinal fidelity has a spine, and that the real danger is mistaking timidity for tradition.
The subtext is distinctly Kuyperian. As a Dutch Reformed theologian and political organizer, he lived in a world where “conservative” could mean protecting establishment comforts, class interests, or churchly respectability. Kuyper’s project (from church reform to pillarization and the founding of the Free University of Amsterdam) depended on conviction with public consequences: orthodoxy that builds institutions, challenges elites, and competes for cultural power. That kind of activism can look disruptive, even radical, compared to a conservatism that mainly wants quiet.
So he reframes the debate. Orthodoxy, in his telling, is not the same as conserving whatever currently exists. It can demand change, conflict, even risk. The insult “spurious” is strategic: it denies his opponents the prestige of the conservative label while claiming the true inheritance for his side. Kuyper isn’t pleading for moderation; he’s insisting that doctrinal fidelity has a spine, and that the real danger is mistaking timidity for tradition.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Abraham
Add to List





