"Do we exert our own liberties without injury to others - we exert them justly; do we exert them at the expense of others - unjustly. And, in thus doing, we step from the sure platform of liberty upon the uncertain threshold of tyranny"
About this Quote
Liberty, in Frances Wright's hands, isn't a warm civic blanket; it's a conditional weapon with a safety catch. The sentence moves like a courtroom instruction: a clean binary (just/unjust) followed by a trapdoor ("threshold of tyranny") that snaps shut if you pretend your freedom is consequence-free. She turns "liberty" from an abstract idol into a practice, something you do to other people as much as something you possess.
The intent is disciplinary in the best sense: Wright is trying to rescue freedom from its favorite alibi, the claim that personal license is automatically moral. Her framing is radical because it refuses to treat harm as an unfortunate side effect. "At the expense of others" reads like an indictment of whole systems - slavery, coerced labor, patriarchal authority - that were routinely justified as one person's rightful liberty (property rights, male prerogative) purchased with another's captivity. Wright was writing in an era when American democracy advertised itself as universal while operating as a gated community. This line punctures the marketing.
The subtext is a warning about the slippery self-deception of the powerful. Tyranny doesn't arrive wearing a crown; it arrives as a "sure platform" you step off while insisting you're still standing on principle. Her rhetoric is deliberately architectural: platform, threshold. Those aren't metaphors for feelings; they're metaphors for movement, for incremental moral drift. Wright is saying the border between freedom and domination isn't philosophical. It's behavioral, and it starts the moment your liberty needs someone else's loss to feel real.
The intent is disciplinary in the best sense: Wright is trying to rescue freedom from its favorite alibi, the claim that personal license is automatically moral. Her framing is radical because it refuses to treat harm as an unfortunate side effect. "At the expense of others" reads like an indictment of whole systems - slavery, coerced labor, patriarchal authority - that were routinely justified as one person's rightful liberty (property rights, male prerogative) purchased with another's captivity. Wright was writing in an era when American democracy advertised itself as universal while operating as a gated community. This line punctures the marketing.
The subtext is a warning about the slippery self-deception of the powerful. Tyranny doesn't arrive wearing a crown; it arrives as a "sure platform" you step off while insisting you're still standing on principle. Her rhetoric is deliberately architectural: platform, threshold. Those aren't metaphors for feelings; they're metaphors for movement, for incremental moral drift. Wright is saying the border between freedom and domination isn't philosophical. It's behavioral, and it starts the moment your liberty needs someone else's loss to feel real.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Frances
Add to List






