"Drug use, within entire teams continues unabated. It is planned and deliberate cheating, with complex methods, sophisticated substances and techniques, and the active complicity of doctors, scientists, team officials and riders. There is nothing accidental about it"
About this Quote
Planned. Deliberate. Nothing accidental. Richard Pound isn t describing a few reckless athletes cutting corners; he s indicting an industry that has routinized fraud. The sentence structure does the work: each clause narrows the escape hatch. If doping is a mistake, you can rehabilitate it. If it s a system, you have to dismantle it.
The choice to zoom out to "entire teams" is strategic. It relocates blame from individual bodies to organizational architecture, where incentives live: sponsorship pressure, roster competition, medicalized performance culture. By emphasizing "complex methods" and "sophisticated substances", Pound preemptively counters the comforting myth that testing will simply catch up. He s saying the arms race is not just chemical but institutional: labs, doctors, and administrators iterating faster than regulators.
Then comes the most politically charged line: "active complicity of doctors, scientists, team officials". That list is a moral escalation. The scandal isn t only that athletes cheat; it s that credentialed professionals convert care and expertise into weaponry. It flips the usual narrative of rogue riders and casts the support staff as enablers, even engineers, of deceit. "Active" matters: not negligence, not ignorance, but participation.
Contextually, Pound speaks from the anti-doping establishment, a figure who helped build WADA s posture of zero tolerance after cycling s repeated crises. The intent isn t just to condemn; it s to justify aggressive governance: raids, sanctions, biological passports, and collective accountability. The subtext is blunt: if you keep treating doping as personal weakness, the system keeps winning.
The choice to zoom out to "entire teams" is strategic. It relocates blame from individual bodies to organizational architecture, where incentives live: sponsorship pressure, roster competition, medicalized performance culture. By emphasizing "complex methods" and "sophisticated substances", Pound preemptively counters the comforting myth that testing will simply catch up. He s saying the arms race is not just chemical but institutional: labs, doctors, and administrators iterating faster than regulators.
Then comes the most politically charged line: "active complicity of doctors, scientists, team officials". That list is a moral escalation. The scandal isn t only that athletes cheat; it s that credentialed professionals convert care and expertise into weaponry. It flips the usual narrative of rogue riders and casts the support staff as enablers, even engineers, of deceit. "Active" matters: not negligence, not ignorance, but participation.
Contextually, Pound speaks from the anti-doping establishment, a figure who helped build WADA s posture of zero tolerance after cycling s repeated crises. The intent isn t just to condemn; it s to justify aggressive governance: raids, sanctions, biological passports, and collective accountability. The subtext is blunt: if you keep treating doping as personal weakness, the system keeps winning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List


