"During the war years I worked on the development of radar and other radio systems for the R.A.F. and, though gaining much in engineering experience and in understanding people, rapidly forgot most of the physics I had learned"
About this Quote
Ryle’s confession lands with the dry precision of a lab note that accidentally reveals a personality. In the middle of a sentence about wartime radar for the R.A.F., he slips in an anti-heroic punchline: he “rapidly forgot most of the physics.” It’s funny because it’s true, and because it punctures the myth that great science is a straight ascent of accumulated knowledge. Under pressure, the mind doesn’t preserve pristine theory; it improvises toward results.
The intent is quietly corrective. Radar was one of WWII’s defining techno-strategic advantages, often narrated as triumphal applied physics. Ryle reframes it as engineering under deadlines, systems integration, and the messy sociology of teams. The subtext is that wartime innovation is less about solitary brilliance than about translating partial understanding into devices that work, in planes, in weather, with unreliable parts, and with people who disagree. His aside about “understanding people” isn’t sentimental; it’s a hard-earned admission that human coordination is as determinant as equations.
Context matters: Ryle would later become a giant in radio astronomy, a field built on instrumentation, calibration, and signal interpretation more than textbook elegance. The war didn’t just give him skills; it reorganized what counted as knowledge. Forgetting physics here isn’t anti-intellectualism. It’s a statement about expertise as a living, perishable resource, constantly traded for practical fluency. The line also hints at a broader postwar shift: science as big, collaborative, and operational - where knowing enough, together, beats knowing everything alone.
The intent is quietly corrective. Radar was one of WWII’s defining techno-strategic advantages, often narrated as triumphal applied physics. Ryle reframes it as engineering under deadlines, systems integration, and the messy sociology of teams. The subtext is that wartime innovation is less about solitary brilliance than about translating partial understanding into devices that work, in planes, in weather, with unreliable parts, and with people who disagree. His aside about “understanding people” isn’t sentimental; it’s a hard-earned admission that human coordination is as determinant as equations.
Context matters: Ryle would later become a giant in radio astronomy, a field built on instrumentation, calibration, and signal interpretation more than textbook elegance. The war didn’t just give him skills; it reorganized what counted as knowledge. Forgetting physics here isn’t anti-intellectualism. It’s a statement about expertise as a living, perishable resource, constantly traded for practical fluency. The line also hints at a broader postwar shift: science as big, collaborative, and operational - where knowing enough, together, beats knowing everything alone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Engineer |
|---|
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List
