"Each kid has a different level of expertise and some of them are very raw and inexperienced and some are incredibly mature and experienced. So you just have to go with what they are rather than have some abstract technique that you're going to try to apply to them"
About this Quote
Cronenberg is talking about children the way he talks about bodies: not as ideals to be perfected, but as realities you have to negotiate. The line rejects the comforting fantasy that directing is a portable “method” you can impose anywhere, like a plug-in preset. With kids, he implies, technique turns into tyranny fast. “Abstract technique” is code for a director’s ego - the desire to control performances through a system rather than through attention.
The intent is practical, but the subtext is moral. Child actors aren’t raw material; they’re people with wildly uneven life experience, verbal skills, and emotional access. Cronenberg’s phrasing (“go with what they are”) suggests a documentary ethic smuggled into fiction filmmaking: you shape the scene around the performer’s capacities instead of forcing the performer into the scene. That’s not softness; it’s craftsmanship. It’s also how you avoid the uncanny falseness that happens when a child is coached into adult-style psychological acting.
Context matters because Cronenberg’s reputation is “cold” and cerebral, the surgeon of human weirdness. Hearing him advocate responsiveness over doctrine is a quiet rebuke to auteur mythology. The director famous for control admits that control has limits - and that the best kind is adaptive. In a culture that loves one-size-fits-all optimization (acting “systems,” parenting “strategies,” education “frameworks”), his point lands as a small act of resistance: technique is useful until it becomes a substitute for actually looking at the person in front of you.
The intent is practical, but the subtext is moral. Child actors aren’t raw material; they’re people with wildly uneven life experience, verbal skills, and emotional access. Cronenberg’s phrasing (“go with what they are”) suggests a documentary ethic smuggled into fiction filmmaking: you shape the scene around the performer’s capacities instead of forcing the performer into the scene. That’s not softness; it’s craftsmanship. It’s also how you avoid the uncanny falseness that happens when a child is coached into adult-style psychological acting.
Context matters because Cronenberg’s reputation is “cold” and cerebral, the surgeon of human weirdness. Hearing him advocate responsiveness over doctrine is a quiet rebuke to auteur mythology. The director famous for control admits that control has limits - and that the best kind is adaptive. In a culture that loves one-size-fits-all optimization (acting “systems,” parenting “strategies,” education “frameworks”), his point lands as a small act of resistance: technique is useful until it becomes a substitute for actually looking at the person in front of you.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List






