"Each one of these treaties is a step for the maintenance of peace, an additional guarantee against war. It is through such machinery that the disputes between nations will be settled and war prevented"
About this Quote
Treaties, in Frank B. Kellogg's telling, are not just promises; they are infrastructure. The phrase "such machinery" is doing heavy ideological work, recasting diplomacy as a system you can build, maintain, and trust to run. That technocratic confidence matters in the interwar years, when elites were desperate to believe war was a solvable design flaw rather than a recurring feature of modern politics. Kellogg is selling process as protection: stack enough agreements and you create "additional guarantees", a kind of legal sandbagging against catastrophe.
The intent is clear: legitimize the proliferating apparatus of international law as the new commonsense. By framing each treaty as "a step", he turns peace into incremental progress, a staircase rather than a fragile truce. It flatters publics weary of bloodshed and reassures legislators who want results without rearmament or messy entanglements. The subtext is equally pointed: if war returns, the failure won’t be imagined as moral or political; it will be a breakdown of procedure, a missing part in the machine.
Context sharpens the stakes. Kellogg, as U.S. Secretary of State, would soon be associated with the Kellogg-Briand Pact, a landmark attempt to outlaw war on paper. His rhetoric captures the era's faith that norms, signatures, and institutions could domesticate power. It also foreshadows the critique: "machinery" can process disputes only if nations consent to be processed. When enforcement is optional and ambition is not, treaties can become less a guarantee against war than a record of how badly people wanted to believe guarantees existed.
The intent is clear: legitimize the proliferating apparatus of international law as the new commonsense. By framing each treaty as "a step", he turns peace into incremental progress, a staircase rather than a fragile truce. It flatters publics weary of bloodshed and reassures legislators who want results without rearmament or messy entanglements. The subtext is equally pointed: if war returns, the failure won’t be imagined as moral or political; it will be a breakdown of procedure, a missing part in the machine.
Context sharpens the stakes. Kellogg, as U.S. Secretary of State, would soon be associated with the Kellogg-Briand Pact, a landmark attempt to outlaw war on paper. His rhetoric captures the era's faith that norms, signatures, and institutions could domesticate power. It also foreshadows the critique: "machinery" can process disputes only if nations consent to be processed. When enforcement is optional and ambition is not, treaties can become less a guarantee against war than a record of how badly people wanted to believe guarantees existed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Frank
Add to List


