"Each player, it will be observed, has eight superior Pieces or officers, and eight minor ones which are called Pawns; and, for the purpose of distinction, the Pieces and Pawns of one party are of a different color from those of the other"
About this Quote
Staunton’s voice here is the velvet glove of instruction: calm, orderly, almost legalistic. He’s not trying to dazzle you with metaphors about war or fate; he’s trying to make chess feel inevitable. The phrase “it will be observed” performs a neat bit of social positioning. It assumes you’re already looking correctly, already part of a club that notices the right details. Chess, in this framing, isn’t a mystery to be cracked but a system to be entered.
Calling the major pieces “superior” and the pawns “minor ones” does more than describe rules. It smuggles in a worldview: hierarchy is natural, legible, and functional. Staunton writes at a moment when Victorian Britain is sorting everything - classes, colonies, professions - into tidy taxonomies. The board becomes a pocket-sized society where rank is explicit and movement is regulated, a reassuring contrast to the messy politics outside the parlor.
Even the emphasis on color is doing double duty. On the surface, it’s a practical “purpose of distinction.” Underneath, it’s the insistence that opposition must be visually unambiguous: two sides, cleanly separated, no confusion about allegiance. That binary clarity is part of chess’s cultural appeal and its ideological seduction. Staunton, a celebrity of his era in the world of chess, isn’t merely explaining equipment; he’s selling a vision of rational conflict where power is categorized, difference is marked, and the drama comes from navigating a rigid order rather than questioning it.
Calling the major pieces “superior” and the pawns “minor ones” does more than describe rules. It smuggles in a worldview: hierarchy is natural, legible, and functional. Staunton writes at a moment when Victorian Britain is sorting everything - classes, colonies, professions - into tidy taxonomies. The board becomes a pocket-sized society where rank is explicit and movement is regulated, a reassuring contrast to the messy politics outside the parlor.
Even the emphasis on color is doing double duty. On the surface, it’s a practical “purpose of distinction.” Underneath, it’s the insistence that opposition must be visually unambiguous: two sides, cleanly separated, no confusion about allegiance. That binary clarity is part of chess’s cultural appeal and its ideological seduction. Staunton, a celebrity of his era in the world of chess, isn’t merely explaining equipment; he’s selling a vision of rational conflict where power is categorized, difference is marked, and the drama comes from navigating a rigid order rather than questioning it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List
