"Early on, it's good to develop the ability to write. Learning to write is a useful exercise, even if what you're writing about is not that relevant"
About this Quote
Gilbert is smuggling a humanist credo into a scientist’s toolkit: writing isn’t the decorative trim of intellect, it’s the machinery. The sly provocation is his permission to be “irrelevant.” In a research culture that fetishizes impact, he argues that low-stakes writing is precisely where the high-stakes skill gets built. Drafts about nothing in particular become the training ground for thinking under pressure later, when the subject does matter and the audience is skeptical.
The intent is practical, almost bench-top advice. “Early on” signals habit formation: writing is a muscle, not a talent you uncover at 30 when grant deadlines arrive. The subtext is a critique of how STEM often treats prose as an afterthought, leaving young scientists to learn clarity only when the cost of confusion is real - misread methods, muddled claims, rejected papers, bad collaborations. Gilbert implies that writing isn’t merely reporting results; it’s how you discover what you actually believe your results mean.
Contextually, coming from a molecular biologist known for shaping the gene-centric era, the line reads as seasoned counsel from someone who watched ideas live or die on the page. Science advances through experiments, but careers and consensus advance through sentences. By decoupling writing practice from immediate relevance, Gilbert protects curiosity from premature optimization - and reminds ambitious trainees that the surest way to become legible to others is to become legible to yourself first.
The intent is practical, almost bench-top advice. “Early on” signals habit formation: writing is a muscle, not a talent you uncover at 30 when grant deadlines arrive. The subtext is a critique of how STEM often treats prose as an afterthought, leaving young scientists to learn clarity only when the cost of confusion is real - misread methods, muddled claims, rejected papers, bad collaborations. Gilbert implies that writing isn’t merely reporting results; it’s how you discover what you actually believe your results mean.
Contextually, coming from a molecular biologist known for shaping the gene-centric era, the line reads as seasoned counsel from someone who watched ideas live or die on the page. Science advances through experiments, but careers and consensus advance through sentences. By decoupling writing practice from immediate relevance, Gilbert protects curiosity from premature optimization - and reminds ambitious trainees that the surest way to become legible to others is to become legible to yourself first.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List





